Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Khalid Jahangir Qazi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that OCI cardholders remain foreigners under the Foreigners Act but are entitled to procedural safeguards under the Citizenship Act before adverse actions like cancellation or blacklisting, setting aside arbitrary orders against the petitioner.
Shri Prit Pal Singh Bhatia v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging allotment of a cooperative society plot, upholding findings of forgery and affirming seniority-based allotment to respondent no.5.
Kabir Paharia v. National Medical Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld expert Medical Boards' reasoned opinions denying MBBS admission to a candidate with benchmark disability, emphasizing the need to balance disability rights with essential medical competencies and patient safety.
Jai Gopal Gulati v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation and alternative land for alleged illegal encroachment by DDA due to inordinate delay, lack of clear ownership proof, and presence of disputed factual questions requiring civil adjudication.
National Health Authority v. M S Intermarc
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 application challenging an arbitral award filed beyond the strict 120-day limitation period, even after excluding pendency under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, is barred and cannot be condoned on administrative grounds.
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) 2 v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld that capital grant subsidies paid by NHAI to BOT concessionaires are not liable to tax deduction at source under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, as such payments are capital contributions and not contractual payments for work.
Management of Ashok Hotel (ITDC) v. Their Workmen & Anr.
The High Court and Industrial Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction by treating contract labour as employees of the principal employer without proper pleadings or reference, and the appeal directing regularization is set aside.
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 v. M/s Adma Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a mere change of company name does not invalidate penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act, but penalty orders passed beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 275(1)(c) are unsustainable.
Cdr. Siddharth Sharma, IN v. CDR AK Srivastava (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired naval officer, ruling that denial based solely on financial grounds despite consistent medical opinion was impermissible.
Lt Col S K Jha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's complaint against denial of promotion and adverse ACR, holding no mala fide or sufficient grounds for interference.
Om Narayan Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement and retiral benefits on the ground of inordinate delay and laches, holding that repeated representations do not excuse a 27-year delay in approaching the Court.
Mohit Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Physical Standard Test result declaring the petitioner unfit after independent medical measurements confirmed compliance with prescribed physical standards, allowing him to continue in the recruitment process.
Mini Stanly v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner retrospective promotional benefits and seniority on a common seniority list for male and female officers, reaffirming the prohibition of gender-based discrimination in promotions.
Nagesh Ratan Daberao v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification for CRPF recruitment, holding that medical fitness must be determined at the time of Medical Board examination and subsequent reports cannot override that decision.
Sgt Anoop Kumar PS v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of a review application seeking premature discharge, holding that the petitioner must challenge the Speaking Order before the tribunal and that grant of relief to others does not mandate identical relief.
Sachin Negi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an Army Hospital for a candidate declared unfit due to defective colour vision, allowing him a fair chance to participate in the recruitment process.
Union of India v. Ex Lem R Jaideep
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for seizure disorder, ruling the disability attributable to military service despite contrary medical opinion.
Rajesh Kumar Jha v. Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of an employee for failing to meet mandatory government sector experience criteria in a recruitment advertisement, affirming the limited scope of judicial review over departmental inquiries.
AstraZeneca AB & Anr. v. Westcoast Pharmaceutical Works Limited
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca, restraining Westcoast Pharmaceutical from infringing its patent on Osimertinib, due to the defendant's failure to file a defense and undertaking not to infringe.
Opella Healthcare Group v. Vaibhav Vohra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar trademark and copyright registrations for 'PHENSERYL', upholding the petitioner's prior rights in 'PHENSEDYL' and emphasizing the need to maintain register purity and prevent consumer confusion in pharmaceutical trademarks.