Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sandeep Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that absence of supervening circumstances and completed investigation preclude bail cancellation under Section 439(2) CrPC.
Sandeep Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to a CBI officer accused of kidnapping, holding that in absence of supervening circumstances and with investigation complete, bail cannot be cancelled.
SHRI KR ANAND v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite limitation objections, which are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Chawla & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded for injuries caused by rash driving outside a workshop, confirming the driver's license validity and the method of income assessment for compensation.
Deepak v. Satya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing the functional disability assessment to 100% permanent disability while upholding the income assessment based on unskilled minimum wages.
M.V. Omni Projects (India) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate contractual disputes between M.V. Omni Projects and Northern Railway, following prior setting aside of arbitral awards.
Principal Commissioner, CGST v. M/S. Federal Mogul Goetze India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an audit report does not constitute an order of determination barring eligibility under VCES, and a show cause notice disqualifies declaration only for dues covered by it, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Shri Inder Mohan Bhambri and Others v. MS Landmark Apartments Private Limited
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from Builder-Buyer Agreements with arbitration seat in Delhi, affirming the Court's jurisdiction despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause for Gurgaon courts.
Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Verizon Global & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Verizon, recognizing its 'VERIZON' mark as well-known and permanently restraining defendants from infringing it.
DELHIVERY LIMITED v. STERNE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a Sole Arbitrator despite the arbitration seat being at Gurgaon and exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on courts at New Delhi.
DELHIVERY LIMITED v. FASTMILE EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a delivery services agreement where parties failed to agree on an arbitrator.
DELHIVERY LIMITED v. FASTMILE EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confirming the court's limited role to verify the arbitration agreement's existence when parties fail to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2 v. Ciena Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's finding that payments for remote technical support and equipment repair did not constitute fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act and India-USA DTAA, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for tax withholding.
Wadhwa General Store & Anr. v. M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding the parties' agreed appointment procedure invalid and directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Sh. Jitender Sharma v. Sh. Nikhil Bansal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability and future prospects in a motor accident claim, applying the Pranay Sethi principle and rejecting claims lacking evidence.
Mahalaxmi Electronics v. M/S Xtreme Media Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is required, and appointed a sole arbitrator despite the respondent's claim of MOU cancellation.
Aakash Educational Services Limited v. Ravi Kant
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate employment-related disputes where parties failed to mutually appoint an arbitrator.
Vardaan Synthetics v. Pawan Traders
Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from an arbitration clause in invoices between Vardaan Synthetics and Pawan Traders.
Shri Jai Bhagwan & Anr. v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of alternate plot allotment for land acquisition claimants due to non-furnishing of adverse report and remanded for fresh consideration with opportunity to be heard.
Rishabh Tandon v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that procedural lapses do not justify bail absent prejudice and that the statutory bar under Section 37 applies.