Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Castrol Limited v. Vivek Sen, Trading as Tridev Auto Parts & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Castrol Limited against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit ex parte due to non-contestation.
M/S R B ENTERPRISES v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside the unilateral appointment challenged by the petitioner.
M/S R B ENTERPRISES v. Union of India
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside the unilateral appointment challenged by the petitioner.
M/S R B ENTERPRISES v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a government contract, holding that unilateral appointment of arbitrator is invalid.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Ms. Mahima Misra, Mr. Naman Agarwal, Mr. Nitin Gupta, Mr. Rishabh Chaudhary, Mr. Vishnu and Mr. Arvind Misra v. Union of India
Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside the unilateral appointment by the respondent and directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Kotak Mahindra General Insuranceco Ltd v. Babita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that filing of a chargesheet and corroborated eyewitness testimony suffice to establish liability in a motor accident claim, rejecting contributory negligence without evidence.
Sandeep Kumar v. Gaurav Tyagi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability in a motor accident claim, upheld assessment of functional disability and salary based on minimum wages, and dismissed insurer's contributory negligence and FIR delay challenges.
Kamaljit Singh @ Kamal v. Protiva Pandey
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition challenging eviction, holding that mere possession without hostile animus does not establish adverse possession and upholding the landlord's ownership and eviction order.
Satya Pal Pathak v. Vijay Kumar Kaushik
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's leave to defend order, holding that the landlord's bona fide need for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act was established and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue.
Faizul (Deceased) v. Mohd. Hamid
The Delhi High Court held that a decree passed against a deceased person is valid and executable against duly impleaded legal heirs who participated in the suit, dismissing objections raised on grounds of non-impleadment.
Arvinder Singh v. Urmila Bali
The Delhi High Court held that bona fide need for eviction is determined as of the petition filing date, subsequent events must completely eclipse that need to be considered, and dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging eviction on these grounds.
Saba Simran v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that personal jewellery worn or carried by a passenger as personal effects is exempt from customs duty and confiscation under the Customs Act and Baggage Rules, quashing the confiscation order against the petitioner.
Niraj Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Customs (ICD) Patparganj
The Delhi High Court held that an importer’s written consent to reassessment and waiver of procedural rights under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act bars subsequent challenge to the enhanced customs valuation based on contemporaneous import data.
SPML Infra Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral tribunal's unilateral fee enhancement order but refused to substitute the tribunal for alleged bias, emphasizing party autonomy and procedural requirements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Garg Trading Co v. Vijay Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the DRC Act against tenants and sub tenants, affirming landlords' bona fide requirement and limiting revisional scope to legality and jurisdictional errors.
Jitender Kaushik v. Sh. Naresh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition seeking enforcement of its order correcting recruitment exam results, granting liberty to revive if respondents fail to comply within four weeks.
Mehraj Human Resources and Immigration Consultant v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disposing of an appeal by remand complies with its time-bound direction and dismissed the contempt petition, permitting the petitioner to submit representations to the Parliamentary Consultative Committee reviewing overseas employment policy.
Babita v. Manish Gupta
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation for allotment of an alternate plot within a specified timeframe, ensuring timely administrative action despite delay in filing.
Mr. Mohit Kumar and Mr. Kunal Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it with a personal hearing and reasoned order within twelve weeks, allowing further legal recourse if aggrieved.
M/S. Hardat Rai Parshotam Dass v. M/S. Roop Lal & Sons
The Delhi High Court upheld concurrent findings that a deed titled as a license was indeed a license and not a lease, dismissing the appeal and directing possession recovery without applying protections under the Slums Act.