Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Daljeet Auto Centre v. Jagmohan Singh Bakshi
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and limiting the scope of revision under Section 25-B(8) to supervisory review without reappraisal of evidence.
Ajay Vishwakarma & Ors. v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside 50% contributory negligence against a deceased pedestrian, applied Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for compensation, enhanced loss of consortium and interest, and directed the Insurance Company to pay Rs. 16,32,500/-.
SH Nepal Singh Koli v. SH Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation under non-pecuniary heads in a motor accident claim while upholding the functional disability assessment, increasing total compensation from Rs. 9.28 lakh to Rs. 10.28 lakh.
Manisha v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning functional disability with certified permanent impairment, recognizing household work as basis for loss of future earnings.
M/S Sunrise Enterprises v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes after exhaustion of the contractual dispute resolution mechanism.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. GOEL TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement.
PNB Housing Finance Ltd v. M/S K.K BANIJYA PVT LTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where an arbitration agreement exists and is undisputed, the court must appoint an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regardless of disputes on merits or settlement claims.
Rajbala v. Mukesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by aligning Functional Disability with Permanent Physical Impairment, recognizing loss of future earnings for a housewife.
M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. JAISWAL TECHNO COMMERCIAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator through DIAC under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration to proceed despite respondent’s non-appearance, affirming the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors. v. Dr Arvind Kumar
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a Tribunal's ad interim order, allowing the writ petition to be withdrawn subject to caveats and directing the Tribunal to proceed with the OA.
Sanjay R Hegde v. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that social media account suspensions must comply with the IT Rules, 2021 and constitutional free speech guarantees, and dismissed the petition after the account was reinstated.
Shabana v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the necessity of a centralized portal under Section 79(3)(b) IT Act to streamline lawful data requests and takedown of unlawful content by intermediaries, directing continued cooperation and reporting.
Promila Bhagat v. Nutan Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the suit as barred by limitation and not maintainable under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, holding that limitation involving disputed facts cannot be decided as a preliminary issue without proper evidence and procedure.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S Veera Builders Thr Its Partner & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the municipal corporation's suit for possession of reserved land held by respondents for over six decades with sanctioned building plans, holding the suit frivolous and without cause of action.
Dharamveer v. Ritu Jain
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises subject to payment of user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 31.10.2025.
Union of India v. Ashish Anan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside prolonged suspension of a police officer due to lack of reasoned orders and directed his reinstatement, emphasizing that suspension must be justified and not punitive.
Ranjita Betarbet v. Subir Banerjee
The Delhi High Court held that a partition suit filed within three years of demand is not barred by limitation and that alleged disownment by public notice does not divest inheritance rights, dismissing the revision petition challenging the suit's maintainability.
Raksha Rani v. Jagdish Raj Saggar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application to dismiss a suit for specific performance, holding that limitation runs from knowledge of cause of action and forgery allegations require trial.
Manat Lamba v. Nikhil Kapur
The Delhi High Court modified excessive daily visitation rights to twice weekly visits, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child and ordering monthly counseling to facilitate co-parenting.
Kamal Singh & Ors. v. SBI General Ins Co. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that claimants are entitled to compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act on a no-fault basis once vehicle involvement in a fatal accident is established, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication of compensation.