Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dr. Shyam Narayan Singh v. Sanjay Kumar
The Supreme Court directed a fact-finding enquiry and administrative adjudication for payment of salary arrears and pension to absorbed employees, dismissing the contempt petition challenging interim withholding of dues.
H. Guruswamy & Ors. v. A. Krishnaiah Since Deceased by Lrs.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a six-year delay in recalling a suit dismissed as abated, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and res judicata principles.
Anraj Devi v. Deepak Kumar
The Supreme Court directed Magadh University to adjudicate and pay family pension and post-retiral benefits to the petitioner’s deceased husband’s family in compliance with its earlier absorption order, disposing of the contempt petition with procedural directions.
Dr. Yugeshwar Yadav v. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.
The Supreme Court directed a fact-finding enquiry to adjudicate disputed claims of salary arrears and pension following absorption into service, holding that interim withholding of payments pending enquiry does not amount to contempt.
PRASHANT BANDYOPADHYAY & ANR v. SUDHIR TRIPATHI & ORS
The Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition directing adjudication of salary arrears and pension claims through due enquiry, dismissing the petition for non-compliance due to incomplete joinder and unresolved claims prior to State bifurcation.
Gopal Sharan Singh v. Deepak Kumar
The Supreme Court directed administrative enquiry into disputed salary arrears and pension claims following absorption orders, dismissing contempt petitions for non-compliance.
Dinesh Kumar Singh and Anr. v. R. K. Mahajan and Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging non-compliance of its order, holding that the commission’s direction to consider candidates for absorption did not mandate positive absorption and no willful disobedience was established.
SRI MUNSHI LAL MAHTO v. SRI SUDHIR TRIPATHY
The Supreme Court held that disputes over appointment validity, pay fixation, and arrears cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings and must be resolved through proper administrative and judicial processes.
Premsila Kuer v. Dr. Amrendra Narayan Yadav & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that the deceased employee's absorption date shall be treated notionally from 12.02.1990 entitling the petitioner to salary and family pension subject to a fact-finding enquiry, and disposed of contempt petitions with directions for adjudication and compliance.
JAI KRISHNA PRASAD YADAV v. DEEPAK KUMAR
The Supreme Court directed fact-finding enquiries to adjudicate disputed claims of salary and pension arrears for absorbed employees, disposing of contempt petitions alleging non-compliance with earlier orders.
Nitin Marutrao Kale v. Manikrao Bajirao Malgunde & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed appeals challenging refusal of interim injunctions in suits for specific performance of sale agreements over joint family land, holding that appellants failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations.
Vijaysinh Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that land granted for running a civil hospital reverts to the Shri Ganpati Panchayat Sansthan upon cessation of that purpose under Section 19(b) of the 1940 Act, directing the State to return the land or acquire it lawfully.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Anusaya Sitaram Devrukhkar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that appeals under Section 74(1) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act must be filed within 120 days, and the Court cannot condone delay beyond this period as Section 5 of the Limitation Act is expressly excluded.
Shashikant Chimanlal Makwana; Pradeep Narottam Harosa; Pattron Hotel and Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. Pramod Karunakar Shetty; PPS Bar and Kitchen LLP
The Bombay High Court appointed an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate disputes under an LLP Agreement, continued interim injunctions against physical interference, and directed production of audited financials while declining to interfere with excise authorities' liquor license suspension.
Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from BSF service for lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Babrey Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary findings of dereliction of duty against a security personnel and held the punishment of salary reduction proportionate, dismissing the writ petition.
Abhishek Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical re-examination by an independent Board to resolve a dispute over corneal opacity affecting fitness for CISF appointment, making the new medical opinion binding.
Kalu Ram Saini v. Union of India
In absence of a prescribed tie-breaker, age-based seniority prevails to resolve equal marks in CISF AC (Executive) LDCE, entitling the petitioner to appointment and retrospective seniority.
Tabassum v. Amna Begum
The Delhi High Court upheld a senior citizen's right to evict family members under the Senior Citizens Act, dismissing claims under the DV Act where no domestic violence allegations against the owner or spouse existed.
Kausthuba Nand Pant v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld adverse entries in the petitioner’s APAR and dismissed his writ petition challenging denial of promotion to Commandant in ITBP, emphasizing the finality of departmental decisions and proper application of promotion guidelines.