Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Surender Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging service matters of an Army personnel, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal as per statutory provisions.
Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Brandavan Food Products
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award for reimbursement of Welcome Drink costs but set aside the award for additional payment for Second Regular Meals, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited v. Boutique Spirit Brands Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registrations for 'BSB MYRON' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered mark 'KYRON' in the alcoholic beverages sector.
Biswajit Ghosh & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, balancing expeditious decision-making with procedural fairness.
Sonu Sahani v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s appointment suitability within eight weeks and to communicate reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Amit Kumar Ram & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, emphasizing timely and reasoned administrative action.
Arvind Kushwah v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and mandated communication of reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Parmar Dishantkumar Subhashbhai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and provide reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Ritesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s application within eight weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action and reasoned communication if found unsuitable.
Sushant Sharma v. U.T. Chandigarh & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed a father's appeal to interact with his son, imposed restrictions on taking the child abroad, protected the child's assets, and appointed a Court Commissioner to ensure safety measures during ongoing guardianship proceedings.
Hansraj v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to inconclusive circumstantial evidence and failure to exclude reasonable doubt, emphasizing strict adherence to the principles governing circumstantial proof.
B.V. RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a director for alleged verbal reprimand and PPE negligence, holding no prima facie case under Sections 269, 270, and 504 IPC was made out.
AC CHOKSHI SHARE BROKER PRIVATE LIMITED v. JATIN PRATAP DESAI & ANR.
The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction over the husband based on an oral contract of joint liability under BSE Bye-laws and that the award was neither perverse nor patently illegal.
Ravi v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence and emphasized cautious application of Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA v. RAMBABU SAINI
The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Board’s 100% disability assessment and enhanced motor accident compensation to Rs.48.7 lakhs including attendant charges and pain and suffering, holding that expert medical opinion must be accepted unless properly challenged.
Amrit Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand
The Supreme Court held that a recruitment advertisement lacking transparency and reservation details is void, quashed all appointments made thereunder, and directed fresh recruitment compliant with constitutional mandates.
Deepak Chauhan v. Mukesh Kumar & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that compensation in motor accident claims involving student victims must be calculated on a higher notional income reflecting future prospects rather than minimum wages, and enhanced the claimant's compensation accordingly.
The State of Maharashtra v. Pramila Vitthal Kawale
The Bombay High Court upheld mid-term police transfers made under Election Commission directives as valid and not temporary deputations limited to the election period, overruling the Tribunal's contrary order.
Swastik Promoters and Developers v. The Competent Authority & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority’s order granting deemed conveyance under MOFA, holding that title disputes lie with civil courts and the Authority’s role is limited to enforcing the promoter’s statutory conveyance obligations.
Madhukar Janardhan Dhole v. The Chief Officer, Baramati Municipal Council & Suchetra Udaysinha Gaikwad
The Bombay High Court directed the Baramati Municipal Council to demolish unauthorized construction despite pending civil suit, affirming the municipal authority's duty to act promptly against illegal structures under public law.