Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Arihant Agency
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause following the borrower's default.
Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. Ana Interventional Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause following the borrower's default.
MG Polyplast Industries Pvt Ltd v. Saneer Anand
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act based on an arbitration clause in commercial invoices, holding that a prima facie arbitration agreement exists from the parties' conduct and invoice terms.
Dr. R.K. Jain v. The State, NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed complete digitization of trial records but dismissed the writ petition seeking FIR registration and compensation for alleged wrongful prosecution, holding such reliefs require appropriate proceedings before trial courts.
Bhairon Ghosh v. Shankar Lal Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Havells India Limited v. Cab-Rio Industries & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Havells India Limited restraining Cab-Rio Industries from using the deceptively similar trademark 'CAB-RIO' for electrical cables, affirming prior user rights and passing off principles.
Deepak Malhotra v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a probate petition, holding that a Will attested by only one witness is invalid under Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, and the Court cannot relax this mandatory requirement even during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Lakhan Singh v. Sh. Ashwani Kumar and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against a mobile vendor for non-appearance, emphasizing strict compliance with vending permits and prior court undertakings.
Gautam Saluja v. Jitender Kumar Sethi & Alka Sethi
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order dismissing the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit challenging the ex parte decree on grounds of fraud was barred by limitation and did not disclose a cause of action.
SFDC Ireland Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the Assessing Officer’s refusal to grant a nil withholding tax certificate under Section 197, holding that tax deduction at source is required unless the non-resident’s income is not chargeable to tax in India and no permanent establishment exists.
Tulsi Ram v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking police directions for FIR registration, holding that certified copies of documents and alternative legal remedies suffice without mandatory police intervention.
Sonu v. Central Bureau Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing the prosecution to rectify an incomplete document post-final arguments without it constituting fresh evidence, holding that such rectification under Section 311 CrPC is permissible and does not violate the accused’s right to a fair trial.
Shubham Yadav v. Central Bureau Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing the prosecution to rectify an incomplete document and recall witnesses post-final arguments, holding it was not fresh evidence requiring further investigation and did not violate the accused’s right to a fair trial.
Nursheid Mansuri @ Vishal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and imposing stringent conditions despite the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Shahbuddin v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a simple injury assault case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and parity with co-accused already on bail.
Anita Sharma v. Ved Prakash Gupta
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate the premises until 30.09.2025 on payment of user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order accordingly.
M/S. PURAN CHAND COMPANY v. SH. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after respondents agreed to withdraw a coercive communication issued despite the petitioner furnishing the required undertaking for extension of possession.
Ramada International, Inc. v. Clubramada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction to Ramada International against defendants for bad faith trademark infringement of the 'RAMADA' mark, awarding damages and costs.
Udhaw Singh v. Enforcement Directorate
The Supreme Court granted bail to an appellant under PMLA due to unreasonable trial delay violating the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.
State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy
The Supreme Court held that a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory before FIR registration under the PC Act if information discloses a cognizable offence, and the Superintendent of Police validly directed FIR registration and investigation based on a detailed source information report.