Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that a non-statutory advisory communication cannot cancel a society's tax registration and that the appellate tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating on the merits of an appeal it found not maintainable.
M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that reopening is impermissible when the issues were already examined during original assessment and no double deduction occurred.
HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until parity in rank with juniors is achieved.
HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until promotions are earned, emphasizing protection of seniority without indefinite delay of merger.
HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s directions that personnel repatriated from MES to the Indian Army must be promoted retrospectively if eligible but cannot delay repatriation pending promotions, ensuring protection of seniority without indefinite retention in MES.
Ponty Singh v. Anu Singh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, holding that having submitted to Singapore court jurisdiction, he cannot seek anti-suit injunction in India restraining foreign divorce proceedings on forum non-conveniens grounds.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS v. MAHENDRA SINGH
The Delhi High Court held that acquittal in a criminal trial does not conclusively establish suitability for police recruitment, affirming the Screening Committee's authority to deny appointment based on the nature of acquittal and character verification.
Navratan Baid v. Neetu Baid
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty, emphasizing equal treatment of spouses regarding infidelity and mental cruelty and recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of certain Civil Services Examination rules regulating attempts and seniority of IPS officers while striking down administrative letters imposing additional conditions beyond the rules.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority-related provisions in the Civil Services Examination Rules and IPS Rules while invalidating administrative letters imposing extra conditions, affirming that exempted probationers cannot suffer seniority loss and retrospective amendments must not prejudice vested rights.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of amendments regulating seniority and attempts in the Civil Services Examination for IPS officers, struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by cadre authorities, and validated retrospective amendments aligning with Supreme Court rulings.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of restrictions on seniority and examination attempts for IPS officers under the Civil Services Examination Rules, struck down unauthorized government letters imposing additional conditions, and validated retrospective amendments to seniority rules consistent with Supreme Court and CAT rulings.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of certain Civil Services Examination Rules regulating attempts and seniority while invalidating administrative letters imposing additional conditions, clarifying the law on probationary training and seniority of IPS officers.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of service rules restricting seniority and attempts in civil services examinations, dismissed challenges to retrospective amendments affecting IPS officers' seniority, and struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by cadre authorities.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of key Civil Services Examination rules regulating probationary training and seniority while striking down unauthorized conditions imposed by government letters and clarifying the limits of retrospective amendments affecting IPS officers' seniority.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority-related amendments to Civil Services Examination Rules and IPS seniority rules while striking down unauthorized conditions imposed by government letters, affirming the balance between executive rule-making and protection of service rights.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of seniority and eligibility rules for IPS officers postponing training to appear in subsequent Civil Services Examinations, struck down unauthorized conditions imposed by authorities, and affirmed retrospective amendments aligning seniority with judicial decisions.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Court upheld the validity of restrictions on civil service candidates seeking to improve their career prospects through subsequent examinations but struck down administrative orders imposing additional conditions beyond the rules and emphasized protection of seniority rights under statutory provisions.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of key provisions regulating seniority and attempts in the Civil Services Examination Rules while invalidating unauthorized embargoes imposed by cadre authorities, affirming the reasonableness of classification between Group 'A' and 'B' services and the limits of retrospective amendments.
Manoj Yadava & Ors. v. Rajiv Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of restrictions on Civil Services Examination attempts and seniority rules while invalidating unauthorized administrative conditions, affirming the Central Government's rule-making powers and consistent seniority fixation.