Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bhushan Capital and Credits Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of assessment after 8 years without failure to disclose income is invalid, quashing reassessment and penalty on accommodation entries disguised as capital gains.
Bholu Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a minor Muslim girl to reside with her husband after finding her mature and consenting, holding that child marriage is voidable and the girl's autonomy must be respected despite parental opposition.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. in terms of the judgment delivered in a related appeal on the same day.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD.'s criminal appeal (Crl.L.P. 489/2011) by referring to the judgment in a connected appeal delivered on the same day.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. in terms of the judgment passed in a related appeal.
Renu v. Ganesh Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced maintenance payable by the respondent husband to his wife and minor children by imputing rental income from disputed property and awarded litigation expenses.
S.K. Sharma v. National Council for Cement of Building Material & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pay parity for an Assistant in an autonomous body with Central Secretariat Service Assistants, upholding the Central Pay Commissions' recommendations for differential pay scales based on nature and responsibility of work.
Shivraj Krishan Gupta v. Chander Krishan Gupta and Ors.
A co-sharer who fails to participate in a court-ordered auction bidding process cannot exercise the right of pre-emption by offering a higher bid after bid opening, and the court’s acceptance of the highest sealed bid stands upheld.
Talwar Medical Centre v. G. Sureka & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a criminal complaint for cheating and criminal breach of trust, holding that the complaint disclosed only civil liability and lacked essential criminal ingredients.
Hitesh Bhasin v. Amarjeet Singh Suri
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in cheque bounce cases where the presumption under Section 139 was rebutted and the complainant failed to prove the underlying liability beyond the disputed admissions.
Hitesh Bhasin v. Amarjeet Singh Suri
The High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal in complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove the underlying debt after the accused rebutted the presumption of liability.
Hitesh Bhasin v. Amarjeet Singh Suri
The High Court upheld dismissal of complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that once the presumption of liability is rebutted, the complainant must independently prove the debt, and admissions obtained under coercion are not binding.
Bhagwati Printers Pvt. Ltd. v. Ram Chander Singh
The Delhi High Court held that correction of awards under Rule 28 ID Rules is limited to clerical or accidental slips and cannot be used to modify substantive relief, setting aside the trial court's order reinstating the respondent after the award was passed.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. by referring to the judgment in a connected appeal.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. by referring to the judgment in a related appeal involving the same parties.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The High Court of Delhi dismissed FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD.'s criminal appeal in terms of a related judgment delivered on the same day.
FINCAP PORTFOLIO LTD. v. STATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed leave petitions challenging dismissal of complaints under Section 138 NI Act due to unexplained delay exceeding 400 days, holding that negligence does not justify condonation of delay.
Smt. Jagir Kaur & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be exercised to quash summoning orders unless no prima facie offence is made out, and dismissed the petition challenging the summoning of accused for offences under IPC.
Ram Niwas v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The court upheld the remand of the dispute to the Labour Court to allow the respondent to lead evidence on the appellant's reporting for duty and the alleged settlement before deciding entitlement to back wages.
Azad Singh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte MACT award, holding that the appellant was duly served and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance.