Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
KARE PARTNERS GROUP INDIA PVT LTD & ANR v. DR. AKHIL BHARGAVA & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders restraining respondents from acting on disputed corporate decisions pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mr.Jagjit Singh, Advocate and Mr.Amit Dubey, Advocate. v. OM PRAKASH & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the classification of certain railway crossings as requiring 8-hour shifts with three gatemen, entitling employees to overtime wages for work beyond 8 hours, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
The Delhi High Court held that the 2009 BSNL Recruitment Rules validly supersede the 2007 Rules, excluding Telecom Technical Assistants from the internal quota does not violate Article 14, and vacancies for direct recruitment posts are to be filled as per the rules in force at the time of selection.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
Delhi High Court held that exclusion of Telecom Technical Assistants from internal quota for BSNL Management Trainee posts is valid, 2009 Recruitment Rules supersede 2007 Rules, and vacancies for direct recruitment posts can be filled as per amended Rules.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld BSNL's 2009 Recruitment Rules restricting internal quota eligibility for Management Trainee posts to executive cadre officers, ruling that direct recruitment posts can be filled as per amended Rules and exclusion of non-executive Telecom Technical Assistants does not violate Article 14.
SH v. K.L. Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions against NDPL on grounds of delay and laches, relying on the reasoning in a prior lead case.
Shaqeela Bano v. Haji Rehman Ellahi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the regular second appeal upholding concurrent findings that the respondent was entitled to possession and mesne profits, holding that no substantial question of law arose to interfere with the factual findings.
Rajesh Kumar v. General Director ESIC Headquarter & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the application for medical reimbursement under the ESI Act was barred by the three-year limitation period and time spent pursuing relief in an incompetent forum cannot be excluded without a formal application.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the 2009 BSNL Management Trainee Recruitment Rules excluding Telecom Technical Assistants from the internal quota, holding the rules valid and applicable and dismissing claims of discrimination and vested rights.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
Delhi High Court upheld BSNL's 2009 Recruitment Rules excluding Telecom Technical Assistants from internal quota for Management Trainee posts, ruling vacancies can be filled as per amended rules and no discrimination arises between distinct cadres.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
Delhi High Court held that amended BSNL Recruitment Rules apply to pending vacancies filled by direct recruitment, excluding Telecom Technical Assistants from internal quota does not violate equality, and set aside CAT order favoring TTAs.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Neeraj Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld BSNL's 2009 Management Trainee Recruitment Rules excluding Telecom Technical Assistants from the internal quota, holding that amended rules govern direct recruitment posts and exclusion does not violate equality under Article 14.
R.C.P. Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme requires fulfillment of normal promotion norms including departmental examinations, dismissing the petitioners' claim for second upgradation without clearing the requisite exam.
Asgar Ali v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a man for raping an 11-year-old girl, holding that credible and consistent testimony of a child victim suffices for conviction even without independent corroboration.
J. S. Chauhan v. Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging compulsory retirement, holding that such orders require competent authority approval, do not mandate departmental enquiry or personal hearing, and delay in challenge disentitles relief even if medical disability is later discovered.
Rajiv @ Diwanji v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and kidnapping, holding that eyewitness identification without a prior test identification parade is admissible when credible and corroborated by fingerprint evidence.
D N Taneja v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that at the cognizance stage, the Magistrate need only find sufficient grounds to proceed and refused to quash the FIR despite the prosecutrix's withdrawal and cancellation report, emphasizing limited scope of interference under Section 482 CrPC.
Delhi Administration Through Designated Officer v. Manohar Lal
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for adulteration of Dal Arhar with prohibited synthetic colouring, ruled that delay in signing the Public Analyst's report does not vitiate evidence absent prejudice, and held that courts cannot impose sentences below the statutory minimum under the PFA Act post-1976 amendment.
Gurmeet Lal v. Narcotic Control Bureau
Suspension of sentence under the NDPS Act requires satisfaction of the twin conditions under Section 37 and cannot be granted solely on the ground of long incarceration.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Dharmender Kumar Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is statutorily liable to pay compensation to third parties despite the driver lacking a valid licence, enhancing compensation based on the deceased's potential income and dismissing the insurer's appeal.