Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
R N Malhotra v. Bhupesh Kumar Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Company Law Board order cancelling cheques does not absolve liability under Section 138 NI Act, and winding up proceedings do not bar criminal complaints without Company Court permission.
Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation with its sole office in India can be sued at that office under Section 20 CPC, clarifying that branches are not separate juristic entities for jurisdictional purposes and allowing clarificatory amendments to the plaint.
Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation with a sole office in India can be sued at that office under Section 20(a) CPC, allowing amendment of the plaint to clarify defendant's identity and restoring suits dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Tata Motors Limited v. JSC VTB Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign corporation carrying on business through its sole office in India can be sued there, allowing clarificatory amendments to the plaint and restoring suits dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Indus Towers Limited v. Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to modify the interim order by mandating an escrow deposit as security for exit compensation claims in a telecom infrastructure asset transfer dispute, emphasizing assignability of contractual obligations and encouraging settlement.
Shubit Education Society v. Govt. of NCT
The Delhi High Court held that an Essentiality Certificate limits school establishment to the specified location, and land allotment inconsistent with it is invalid, dismissing the appellant's claim for allotment in a different locality.
Mohdirfan v. State
The Delhi High Court held that an earlier order exempting a guest house from licence requirements is not binding if passed without considering relevant regulations, and dismissed the petition challenging prosecution for running the guest house without a licence.
R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition Crl.M.C. 2787/2010 filed by R.N. Malhotra by referring to the judgment in a related petition decided on the same day.
850c33cad9e8941b16dda8e08aebff3f0616743762884dbf970220d1247ca6d5
The High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions for non-prosecution due to non-filing of written submissions and absence of petitioners at the hearing.
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-VM v. REI Infra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals challenging the remand of issues on higher depreciation, interest-free loans, and Rule 8D applicability to the Assessing Officer, affirming the Tribunal's directions and existing precedents.
Parnika Commercial & Estate (P) Ltd v. Govt of NCT
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to raise additional claims before the appointed arbitrator and directed the arbitrator to consider all claims in accordance with law under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition in CRL.M.C. 2789/2010 in terms of the judgment passed in a connected case CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.
Anil Dass & Ors. v. Babulal Gupta & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the appeal for default and non-prosecution due to the appellants' failure to appear and pursue the appeal.
R N Malhotra v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain & Ors.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed petition CRL.M.C. 2788/2010 by referring to its concurrent judgment in CRL.M.C. 2782/2010.
Bartronics India Ltd v. MCD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement in a dispute over G2C kiosk installations.
Parivar Seva Sanstha v. Marie Stopes International
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals against an interim injunction, directing expeditious trial to resolve the dispute over a challenged agreement.
Mohd. Kallu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a minor, ruling that delay in FIR and absence of external injuries do not negate credible prosecutrix testimony and that false implication must be proven.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gita Duggal
The Delhi High Court held that multiple independent units within a residential building qualify collectively as 'a residential house' under Sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act, allowing capital gains exemption accordingly.
Mahant Sharda Ram v. D.D.A.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal against the rejection of restoration of a suit dismissed in default, upholding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance despite multiple opportunities.
Leela Nand v. Indian Airlines Corpn. Ltd. & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the suit for declaration of date of birth was barred by limitation, as the limitation period runs from the first accrual of cause of action and cannot be restarted by subsequent events.