Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
The Managing Committee Arwaching Bharti Bhawan Senior Secondary School v. Ms. (Dr.) Angel Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a 90% pass rate condition for terminating a probationary teacher is illegal and that repeated termination and reappointment on probation violates statutory protections under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.
Pramod v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for kidnapping and rape but modified the sentence to the period already served, granting leniency based on mitigating factors.
Davinder Jeet Kaur v. Secretary, NCT & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs school to pay salary and arrears to employee as per 6th Pay Commission Report with interest, following prior authoritative ruling.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Sukhbir Singh
The High Court remitted the matter to the Labour Court to record specific findings on all charges before deciding entitlement to back wages in a disciplinary removal case.
The Management of M/S Hotel Janpath v. Its Workmen Through All India Prayatan Jan Mazdoor Sabha and Ors
The High Court held that an application to recall an ex parte award must be considered on merits if the applicant is duly authorized, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after setting aside the dismissal on procedural grounds.
Ram Kumar Gupta v. State & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of a later Will executed under suspicious circumstances, upholding the earlier Will as the last testament of the deceased.
Satish Kapoor v. Vandana Kapoor & Ors.
This judgment in CS(OS) 1642/2011 refers to a related case for detailed findings and primarily deals with procedural applications in a civil family dispute.
Sanjay Kumar v. Ashok Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier and recognizing the appellant as a skilled worker, granting additional amounts for conveyance and attendant charges.
Babu Khan v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary proceedings against a mentally ill RPSF constable due to procedural violations and failure to ensure fair opportunity, ordering reinstatement and fresh inquiry.
Rajesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for kidnapping and sexual offences but modified the sentence to the period already served, granting release on bail in the interest of justice.
Bela Kapoor & Ors. v. Vandana Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a family settlement reached through court-referred mediation under Section 89 CPC, dismissing objections of misrepresentation and enforcing the compromise without trial.
Vandana Kapoor & Anr. v. Satish Kapoor
The judgment in CS(OS) 2299/2010 refers to the decision in CS(OS) 1375/2010 for substantive issues without providing an independent ruling.
Satish Kapoor & Ors. v. Ankur Arora and Ors.
Judgment in CS(OS) 741/2012 delivered by Delhi High Court refers to the decision in CS(OS)1375/2010 for detailed findings.
Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan & Ms. Latika Dutta v. Asha Pal Gulati Thr. Lrs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the lease deed and Master Plan do not mandate exclusive residential use of the third floor of commercial buildings, dismissing DDA's appeals against lessees using the floor commercially.
Sushil Dutt Salwan & Latika Dutta v. Krishan Verma
The judgment in LPA No. 1133/2004 refers to the detailed decision in LPA No. 1084/2004 without providing separate reasoning or orders.
State of Maharashtra v. Fazal Rehman Abdul
The Supreme Court upheld the acquittals of accused in the 1993 Bombay Blast case, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance for confessions and the principle that appellate courts should not interfere with acquittals unless the trial court's findings are perverse or unsustainable.
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of Yakub Memon in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts case, affirming procedural requirements for judgments and the admissibility of confessional statements and corroborated evidence in terrorism-related convictions.
Ahmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A.S. Mubarak S v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld convictions under TADA for possession of arms and explosives in the 1993 Bombay Blast case, affirming the validity of recovery evidence and rejecting challenges to confessional statements and acquittals on conspiracy charges.
Secretary to Government of India v. Sawinder Kaur
The Supreme Court held that freedom fighter pension granted on secondary evidence is effective only from the date of the order granting pension, not retrospectively from the date of application or scheme commencement.
Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld life sentences of appellants convicted under TADA for conspiracy and facilitation in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, affirming the admissibility of co-accused confessions corroborated by independent evidence.