Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Darshan Singh & Ors v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court held that FCI must extend revised piece rate wages under Circular No.4/2004 to DPS workers at Dhuri Centre, rejecting the respondent’s jurisdictional and contractual objections.
Pream Chand v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's recruitment for Laboratory Technician due to non-fulfillment of recognized MLT course duration as per Recruitment Rules, despite the advertisement's omission on course duration.
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SMT SOM WATI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the insurance company liable for compensation despite minor discrepancies and the driver's learner's license.
CAPART & Anr. v. BR SUMAN
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's quashing of compulsory retirement penalty for a CAPART officer, holding the charge sheet was not vague and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication considering the inquiry evidence.
Union of India & Anr. v. Sanjeev Kapur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that promotions to Director Grade-I in Defence Quality Assurance Service must be made from an integrated seniority list of Principal Scientific Officers across disciplines, rejecting seniority based solely on date of joining when affected by administrative delays.
Union of India v. Umesh Nanda & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of penalty and compulsory retirement of an IAS officer, holding that adverse entries and penalty were unjustified and based on misdirected evaluation of evidence.
Union of India v. Umesh Nanda & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of penalty and set aside compulsory retirement of an IAS officer, holding that adverse service entries based on flawed penalties cannot justify compulsory retirement.
Nighat Parveen v. MCD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that seniority among directly recruited employees must be based on order of merit and allowed revision of a seniority list corrected within a reasonable period despite prior promotions and delay in challenge.
Vikas Kumar & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate appointment is intended for families facing sudden financial distress and denied the petitioner's claim where the deceased had pensionable service and the family was not in distress, while allowing consideration if a suitable post is found.
UOI and Ors. v. Swati S. Patil
The Delhi High Court upheld that incomplete below benchmark ACR gradings not accepted by higher authorities must be ignored for promotion, and representations against such gradings must be considered by a superior authority, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Surjeet Singh Chawla
The Delhi High Court held that a BSNL employee appointed after 2003 cannot withdraw resignation after acceptance, as CCS (Pension) Rules do not apply and compassionate grounds do not override settled law.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Aradhana Drinks & Beverages Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's finding that liabilities related to leased assets legitimately taken over in a slump sale must be included in asset valuation, negating unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
Sh. Om Braham v. Food Corporation of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of an FCI employee for Central Government terminal benefits due to failure to validly exercise the statutory option within prescribed time and inordinate delay in filing the petition.
Rinki v. State
The court upheld the fundamental right of an adult married couple to live peacefully and directed protection against family threats under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Dharam Singh @ Binder v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for attempt to murder, affirming that credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence suffice to prove dangerous injuries even without examination of the treating doctor.
Capt. R.L. Mathur v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that refusal of voluntary retirement without valid reasons or a speaking order is arbitrary, directing Air India to grant the petitioner voluntary retirement with benefits.
Sh. Badan Lal v. Sh. Rajesh Gullah
The Delhi High Court upheld a summary decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC where the defendant admitted receipt of Rs. 24 lakhs but failed to establish a triable defense regarding its alleged forfeiture as part of a land sale.
None. v. STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ANR .....
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate appointment is a concession dependent on a prevailing scheme and dismissed the petitioner’s claim where no such scheme was in force at the time of application nearly two decades after the employee’s death.
Arvind Pratap Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the non-filling of Ex-servicemen reserved vacancies in RPF recruitment, holding that vacancies can be filled from unreserved category on merit if suitable reserved candidates are unavailable and no vested right to appointment arises without selection.
Mohd. Sabir v. M.C.D.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the regular second appeal for lack of substantial question of law and insufficient cause for delay in filing, upholding concurrent factual findings on property ownership.