Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant lacks a money-lender’s license under the Punjab Act, where the loan was advanced on negotiable instruments like cheques.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable despite the complainant not holding a money-lender’s license under the Punjab Act, as advances by cheque are excluded from the definition of loan under the Punjab Act.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on dishonor of cheques are maintainable even if the complainant lacks a money-lender's license under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, as such advances are excluded from the Act's definition of loan.
Shakuntla Navani v. Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that an employee suspended unjustifiably and awarded only a minor penalty is entitled to full pay and allowances for the suspension period, which must be treated as duty.
S.K. Taqui v. The Cement Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an employee for misusing House Building Advance after a fair inquiry, affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary proceedings.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Budh Prakash
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a compensation award in an industrial dispute case due to the small amount involved, without examining the merits.
National Board of Examinations v. Vipin Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that mere possession of a mobile phone during an examination without evidence of its use does not constitute unfair means warranting penalty.
MR. SUBRAT BASAK & ORS v. RASHTRIYA PARIYOJNA NIRMAN NIGAM LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that employees posted in Iraq are entitled to salary arrears under the IVth Pay Commission in Indian Rupees with interest, rejecting their claim for payment in Iraqi Dinars absent any contractual or policy basis.
IDPL v. The Secretary, Government of India & Ors.
Employees who have taken voluntary retirement from a sick public sector company are not entitled to pay revision arrears, as the employer-employee relationship ends and financial incapacity bars such claims.
IDPL v. The Secretary, Government of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of retired IDPL employees seeking retrospective 5th Pay Commission benefits, holding that pay revision depends on the financial capacity of the sick PSU and cannot be granted retrospectively to those retired before the effective date.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant lacks a money-lender’s license under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, when the debt is evidenced by a cheque.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant is not a registered money-lender under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, as advances by negotiable instruments like cheques do not constitute 'loans' under that Act.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant money lender lacks a license under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, as loans advanced on negotiable instruments like cheques are excluded from the licensing requirement.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on dishonored cheques are maintainable even if the lender lacks a money-lender's license under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, as such loans are excluded from the Act's bar.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant lacks a money lending licence under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, as advances by cheque are excluded from the Act's ambit.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are not barred by the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938 when the debt arises from advances made on negotiable instruments like cheques, and set aside dismissals based on lack of money-lender license.
Virender Singh v. Deepak Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are maintainable even if the complainant is not a registered money-lender under the Punjab Registration of Money-lender’s Act, 1938, when the advances are made on negotiable instruments like cheques.
C.P. INASU v. DDA
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to allot a fresh MIG flat to the petitioner after finding the petitioner was a victim of double allotment caused by DDA officials and rejected the plea of delay and laches.
Rozy Vijender @ Elizabeth Samuel v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Rozy Vijender alias Elizabeth Samuel against the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence by referring to a common judgment in a related case.
Kush Dairy Limited v. H.P. Printers Pvt Ltd
The court held that filing a suit waives the right to arbitration, granted unconditional leave to defend under Order 37 CPC, and stayed the suit under Section 10 CPC pending resolution of a related suit.