Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India and Ors. v. Doly Loyi
The Delhi High Court held that mere sanction for prosecution does not justify withholding promotion under the sealed cover procedure; prosecution must be pending with charge sheet filed and cognizance taken for the procedure to apply.
Ravinder Chaddha v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders taking cognizance of offences can be corrected for inadvertent omissions before charge framing, and discharge of an accused requires an express order at the charge stage.
Ashok Kumar & Anr v. SBI Officers Association (Delhi Circle) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to disciplinary action and election in an association fall outside the arbitration clause and must follow specific internal remedies, dismissing interim relief petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Pooja Bhatia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the motor accident compensation award and additionally granted damages for loss of love and affection to the deceased's dependents.
Sanjay Kumar Singh & Anr v. Cosmos Infra Engineering (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a sub-lease agreement despite the respondent's claim of contract termination.
Krishan Kumar Nath v. Sohan Brahm Nath
The Delhi High Court held that in a compromise decree involving reciprocal promises, payment need not be tendered unless the other party is ready to perform, dismissing objections to execution as abuse of process and directing enforcement with costs and potential penal action under Section 74 CPC.
Union of India v. Vijender Singh; Union of India v. Sh. Laxman Prasad; Union of India v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the Casual Labour (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme, 1993 applies only to Group 'D' casual labourers and denied temporary status and regularization to contract workers engaged in Group 'C' posts.
Union of India v. Vijender Singh; Union of India v. Sh. Laxman Prasad; Union of India v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the Casual Labour Scheme, 1993, applies only to Group 'D' casual labourers and denied temporary status and regularization to contract Motor Lowry Drivers categorized as Group 'C' employees, setting aside the Tribunal's contrary orders.
Union of India v. Vijender Singh; Union of India v. Sh. Laxman Prasad; Union of India v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that the Temporary Status Scheme, 1993 applies only to Group 'D' casual labourers and contract workers engaged in Group 'C' posts are not entitled to temporary status or regularization under this Scheme.
Ramraj v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Ramraj by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case on the same day.
Sarfu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for robbery under Section 394/34 IPC, emphasizing the reliability of the injured victim's testimony and drawing adverse inference from the accused's refusal to participate in Test Identification Parade.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. Living Media India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment under Section 147/148 is invalid if based on reasons recorded after issuance of the Section 148 notice or without valid material, thereby quashing the reassessment order.
Shri Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society
The Supreme Court held that a fresh departmental enquiry cannot be held post-retirement on vague charges and upheld the quashing of the appellant's termination for defective enquiry and lack of proof.
M/S. ABHAYANANDA ASSOCIATES v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER & ANR.
The Supreme Court directed the auction purchaser to pay the auction amount and property tax dues, obliging the bank to issue the sale certificate, thereby modifying the High Court's dismissal of the purchaser's appeals.
Samir Mustafabhai Bajariya v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld suspension of sentence and granted bail to the appellant during the pendency of the appeal for offences under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, and 120B IPC.
Bharat Bhushan v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the rape conviction of a juvenile offender but set aside the sentence under the Juvenile Justice Act, directing his release after considering his juvenility and time served.
Litta Singh v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court modified the appellants' murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC due to lack of intention to cause death, sentencing them to ten years' imprisonment.
Thammu Panduranga Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(2) IPC, rejecting the appellants' claim of private defence and dismissing their appeal.
P. DEVARAJAN v. STATE OF KERALA
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order permitting unauthorized withdrawal of a criminal revision petition and remanded the case for decision on merits.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & others v. Madu Giri & Ors.; Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Another v. Mohini Devi
The Supreme Court held that retired employees who failed to comply with mandatory conditions of refunding employer's CPF share with interest are not entitled to pension benefits under the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension Regulations, 1989.