Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Manmohan Singh v. Kushwant Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s interim maintenance order fixing ₹12,500 per month based on reasonable income estimation despite lack of exact proof, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Article 227.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III v. Nirmal Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of capital gains addition, ruling that exemption under section 2(14)(iii) requires agricultural land beyond 8 km from municipal limits and the Tribunal cannot reopen issues without factual basis.
Satya Infrastructure Ltd & Ors. v. Satya Builders Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to plaintiffs for trademark infringement and passing off against a defendant using the identical mark "SATYA" in the same business sector.
Sanjay Shankar Swami v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence of appellants for armed robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC, ruling that identification at arrest and use of deadly weapons justified the conviction despite procedural defects.
Anand J. Datwani v. Geeti Bhagat Datwani & Ors.
The Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 does not apply to land that has ceased to be agricultural by reason of residential construction and use, thus civil courts have jurisdiction over partition suits relating to such land.
Rajesh Kumar Saxena v. DDA
The Delhi High Court allowed the legal heir's petition for transfer and allotment of a flat originally allotted to his deceased father, rejecting DDA's hyper-technical objections to delayed document submission and permitting payment at prevailing rates.
Sudarshan Sharma v. DDA
The Delhi High Court held that improper service of a demand letter by DDA invalidated charging 2009 prices, directing payment based on 2003 prices with interest.
Rajpal and Ors. v. D.D.A.
The Delhi High Court held that disputed factual questions regarding land demarcation and acquisition cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction and must be adjudicated by Civil Courts.
PACE DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS PVT LTD v. GOVT. OF NCT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside a government circular prohibiting registration of conveyances based on GPA, Will, or Agreement to Sell, holding that genuine transactions cannot be denied registration and must be examined on merits in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Centre for Development of Telematics v. Instrumentation Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a royalty payment dispute where the respondent failed to concur in the arbitrator's appointment.
Centre for Development of Telematics v. Instrumentation Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a royalty payment dispute where the respondent failed to concur with the arbitrator's appointment.
SH. C.L.GUPTA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
The court held that voluntary retirement is effective upon acceptance regardless of non-payment of dues, directing the employer to pay withheld retirement benefits with interest after the employee vacates company property.
Mahant Atma Ram v. UOI
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act by applying the highest bona fide sale transaction principle, allowing solatium and interest, and clarifying valuation adjustments.
Crescent Exports Ltd. v. Madhuri Vali
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree of possession under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC based on clear admissions regarding expiry of lease and valid termination notice, dismissing the tenant's appeal.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III v. Nirmal Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of capital gains addition, holding that exemption under section 2(14)(iii) requires agricultural land beyond 8 km from municipal limits and the Tribunal rightly declined to reopen the land's nature without foundational facts.
M/S CHUGH KATHURIA ENGINEERS (P) LTD. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 is limited and upheld the arbitral award finding that a document was obtained under duress and the delay in contract completion was attributable to the respondent.
Bhushan Sharma v. State (Thru C.B.I.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a bill clerk for demanding and accepting a bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that credible trap evidence and consistent witness testimony suffice despite minor contradictions and non-examination of a co-accused.
Commissioner Income Tax-V v. Nipuan Auto Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order dismissing additions under Section 68 where the assessee proved the identity and creditworthiness of share applicants through credible documentary evidence.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III v. Nirmal Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of short term capital gain addition, ruling that without foundational doubt on the agricultural nature of land, the Tribunal need not examine that issue for exemption under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act.
Mohd Aslam v. Mst Naima Khatoon & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under Section 14(1)(e) DRCA, holding that leave to defend is denied absent triable issues and bonafide requirement was established by landlords.