Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shitiz Metals Limited v. Registrar of Companies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored a company struck off under the Easy Exit Scheme upon finding creditor fraud and non-disclosure, affirming the court's power under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act to protect creditors' rights.
Schneider Electric India Private Limited v. Unsecured Creditors
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Compromise and Arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings due to the consent of all shareholders and unsecured creditors and absence of secured creditors.
O.C. Denims and Special Finishes Limited v. Orient Craft Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to overwhelming consent and protection of creditors' interests.
Anita Kumari Gupta v. Ved Bhushan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's partition suit challenging a Will and mutation, holding the suit barred by laches and not disclosing a cause of action.
Rajesh @ Raju v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction but ordered the sentences in multiple robbery cases to run concurrently, facilitating his early release.
DIT v. Jyoti Foundation
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act requires a clear finding that the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue, and remanding for further inquiry without such finding is impermissible.
Satish Anand v. Deep Chand Anand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject a plaint on grounds of undervaluation, holding that valuation disputes require evidence and are to be decided at trial.
Bhai Sunder Das Sardar Singh Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhai Balbir Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a court-referred mediated settlement in family property disputes is binding but requires formal recording and decree drawing by the Single Judge to be enforceable.
COIM INDIA PVT LTD v. KURT O JOHN SHOE COMPONENTS(I) PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application for leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of outstanding payment with interest, holding that no triable issue was raised and Delhi courts had jurisdiction.
Suman Bala v. Virender
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by granting 50% future prospects and increased non-pecuniary damages, while adjusting personal expenses deduction and directing the Insurance Company to pay the enhanced amount.
Punjab National Bank v. Vijender Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that lease extensions require fresh registered deeds and absent such, tenancy becomes month-to-month and can be validly terminated, dismissing the appellant's appeal against ejectment.
Ghan Shyam Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that pension is a vested statutory right payable from the date of superannuation and cannot be denied on the basis of "no work no pay" where service was interrupted due to court martial proceedings later set aside.
Prem Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.; Kailash Chand Gurjar v. Union of India; Ram Rajiv & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Rule 219(j) of the Indian Railways Employment Manual contingent on the existence of a seniority list under Rule 320, dismissed challenges to select lists on limitation grounds, and clarified the non-retrospective effect of the Railway Board's 2009 circular.
Prem Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.; Kailash Chand Gurjar v. Union of India; Ram Rajiv & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Rule 219(j) of the Indian Railways Employment Manual, clarified its application contingent on the existence of a seniority list under Rule 320, and dismissed writ petitions challenging promotion select lists as barred by limitation and properly prepared.
Prem Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.; Kailash Chand Gurjar v. Union of India; Ram Rajiv & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Rule 219(j) of the Indian Railways Employment Manual subject to the existence of a seniority list under Rule 320, and dismissed writ petitions challenging select lists on limitation and procedural grounds.
Parul Gupta v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the decision limiting participants in the Deaflympics, emphasizing the need to maximize differently abled athletes' participation unless justified otherwise.
Shri Raj Pal Singh v. Sardar Patel Public Senior Secondary School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a school cannot withhold salary arrears, bonus, or increments due to financial difficulty and directed payment with interest as per unchallenged administrative orders.
Anuradha Gulati v. Directorate of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that delayed payment of gratuity to a school teacher entitles her to statutory interest, overruling departmental circulars that conflict with the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Mohd. Naseem v. Urdu Academy, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that seniority between two employees appointed on the same date is determined by age, and a new challenge to appointment cannot be raised by additional affidavit without prior pleading.
Delhi Printers Association v. Commissioner of Industries, GNCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld DSIDC's entitlement to recover interest on delayed payments from allottees as per allotment letter terms, following the Supreme Court's prior ruling.