Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Subhash Hiraman Jandhade v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court held that possession and mutation entries in respect of Survey No.80/3 under a consent partition decree cannot be reopened by revenue authorities, quashing impugned orders affecting the same, while remitting partition of other lands to the Collector.
Charanjit Singh v. V.K. Chabra
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs. 4.76 crore with interest, holding that the defendant’s written acknowledgment restarted limitation and awarding pendente lite and future interest at contractual rate.
Kunal Bedi & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following a full and final settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the promotion of peace and harmony between parties.
Bhupinder Singh Jolly v. Suraj Prakash Chopra
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding the provision directory and the petitioner’s defense insufficient to deny compensation.
Naval Kishore Kapoor v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under Section 43D(5) UA(P) Act, holding that prima facie evidence of conspiracy to channel terror funds exists and the trial is underway without undue delay.
Baljeet Singh v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, holding that minor inconsistencies in a child victim's testimony do not negate the presumption of guilt once foundational facts are proved.
Lajjawati Sharma & Anr. v. Ram Chander Jain Thr Legal Heirs
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the dismissal of eviction on ownership grounds, holding that a landlord need only prove better title than tenant and remanded for consideration of bona fide need and alternate accommodation.
Kapil Sachdev v. Pinaki Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order dismissing the tenant's leave to defend, affirming that a tenant cannot challenge the landlord's title under Section 116 of the Evidence Act and that the landlord proved bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
M/S SKECHERS SOUTH ASIA PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court, following the Supreme Court's review in Canon-II, held that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, and directed continuation of proceedings against Skechers South Asia Pvt Ltd.
M/S SUMINOE TEIJIN TECHNO KRISHNA INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Supreme Court’s review judgment affirms that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, empowering them to issue show cause notices, thereby overruling earlier jurisdictional objections.
M/S C-NET COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Supreme Court clarified that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, empowering them to issue show cause notices, leading to dismissal of writ petitions challenging their jurisdiction.
Maruti Suzuki India Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court, following the Supreme Court's review judgment, held that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 with jurisdiction to issue show cause notices, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Seetu Kohli Concepts Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court, following the Supreme Court's review judgment, held that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 with jurisdiction to issue show cause notices, and restored the adjudication of the petitioners' refund proceedings.
Satinder Singh Bhasin v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the U.P. Police's arrest of the petitioner without following prescribed interstate arrest procedures and without prior Supreme Court permission was illegal, ordered his release, and directed a high-level inquiry and preservation of evidence.
Om Saran Gupta v. Nishi @ Nishi Jaidka
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking prosecution for alleged perjury and forgery in Section 138 NI Act proceedings, holding that Section 340 CrPC applies only to offences committed after documents are filed in court and that service of complaint suffices as legal notice.
Mannat Group of Hotels Private Limited & Anr. v. M/S Mannat Dhaba & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants for infringing the plaintiffs' registered 'MANNAT' trademarks and passing off in the hospitality sector, decreeing the suit ex-parte due to defendants' non-appearance.
Maj Paneet Gill v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order denying interim protection to Short Service Commissioned Officers challenging denial of Permanent Commission, directing expedited adjudication of their Original Applications.
Arun Nagar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner unfit for Armed Forces recruitment due to right eye corneal opacity, dismissing challenges based on contrary medical reports.
Lt Col Jaspreet Kaur v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to a Short Service Commissioned officer against release pending the Armed Forces Tribunal's judgment, following the Supreme Court's precedent.
ST ENGINEERING AEROSPACE ENGINES PTE LTD v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR
Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued without valid service to a Singapore-based assessee and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the requirement of proper notice and opportunity under the Income Tax Act.