Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mr. Sanjiv Bahl and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advocates. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of an entire lecturer recruitment process at NCCT due to widespread irregularities, holding that en masse cancellation without individual hearings is justified when foundational facts establish the process is vitiated and segregation of tainted candidates is impossible.
Rakesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal without a formal inquiry under Rule 9 of the Railway Servants Rules, 1968 violates natural justice and remanded the matter for a proper disciplinary inquiry.
Insp. J.S. Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar v. Parwati @ Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Parwati for lack of evidence but upheld Jeepu's conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder in an acid attack case, reducing her sentence from eight to five years.
Insp. J.S. Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar v. Parwati @ Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Parwati, maintained Jeepu's conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder with reduced sentence, and dismissed State's appeal for conspiracy and enhanced punishment in an acid attack case.
Insp. J.S. Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar v. Parwati @ Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted one accused, upheld culpable homicide conviction of another with reduced sentence, and dismissed State’s appeals in an acid attack case due to inconsistent prosecution evidence and unreliable dying declarations.
Insp. J.S. Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar v. Parwati @ Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Parwati for lack of evidence, upheld Jeepu’s conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304-II IPC, and reduced her sentence from eight to five years imprisonment in an acid attack case.
Insp. J.S. Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar v. Parwati @ Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court acquitted Parwati for lack of evidence but upheld Jeepu’s conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder in an acid attack case, reducing her sentence from eight to five years.
Krishna Bhagwan Kotak v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court discharged private accused in a CBI cheating case due to absence of prima facie material and confirmation by SCI that no wrongful loss was caused as disputed invoices were neither authorized nor paid.
Ashraf Chitalwala v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2015-16 due to non-communication of reasons recorded and absence of failure to disclose material facts, holding that reopening on mere change of opinion is impermissible.
Sunil v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that no copyright subsists in a mere film title and registrations with film producers’ associations do not confer enforceable rights against non-members, dismissing the plaintiff’s injunction application against the use of the title 'LOOTERE' for a web series.
Rakesh @ Pintya Ramesh Rane v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court set aside the murder convictions due to unreliable identification parade and untrustworthy dying declaration, upholding acquittals for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
State v. Sabir
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of Sabir in a rape case due to lack of medical evidence and inconsistencies in the victim's testimony, emphasizing that acquittals will not be disturbed unless the trial court's view is perverse.
Mapra Laboratories Private Limited v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2008-2009, holding that no failure to disclose material facts occurred and the reassessment amounted to impermissible change of opinion.
Dharmender Kumar Paswan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Dharmender Kumar Paswan for the murder of his live-in partner based on circumstantial evidence despite rejecting the child witness's testimony as tutored.
Kiran Harsukhlal Hemani v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of the CBDT's corrigendum notification restricting the benefit of Section 80IB(10) proviso to housing projects approved between 2004 and 2008, holding it prospective and intra vires.
Kiran Harsukhlal Hemani v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a CBDT corrigendum notification restricting tax deduction benefits under Section 80IB(10) to projects approved between 2004 and 2008, holding the proviso prospective and the notification intra vires.
Union of India v. Balakrishnan Thiruvengadam Mudaliar
The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting backwages to a government servant wrongfully compulsorily retired and reinstated with a lesser penalty, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.
Reminiscent India Television Ltd v. Status Video
The court held that a debtor's prior unconditional agreement to pay a creditor precludes belated challenges to the creditor's locus standi in a company petition, dismissing the appellant's appeals and upholding the winding-up order.
State v. Deep Chand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that circumstantial evidence must conclusively prove guilt and exclude third party involvement, which was not established in this murder case.