Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajender Singh v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court allowed early release of compensation funds deposited as FDR under a Lok Adalat award, setting aside the Tribunal's refusal, based on the petitioner's genuine financial need.
Dinesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the rejection of a candidate's appointment based on handwriting mismatch after forensic examination confirmed the handwriting matched, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.
Vijay Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of the candidate after forensic confirmation of thumb impression matching, overruling rejection based on handwriting/signature mismatch.
Yogesh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Tribunal's order rejecting candidature on handwriting mismatch after forensic thumb impression verification confirmed the petitioner's identity, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.
Dinesh Kumar Gurjar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside cancellation of candidature based on handwriting mismatch, relying on FSL thumb impression report and emphasizing the need for expert examination and adherence to natural justice.
Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of candidature cancellation for minor OMR erasure, emphasizing adherence to recruitment instructions and binding coordinate bench precedent.
Ravi Prakash Singh @ Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court held that filing the charge sheet on the ninetieth day complies with Section 167(2) CrPC, and the accused is not entitled to bail if the charge sheet is filed within the statutory period.
Sunil Vishwanath Madavi & Ors. v. The Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that five buildings constructed without MMRDA permission and partly on government land are unauthorized and illegal, directing enforcement of demolition orders and rejecting invalid Panchayat permissions.
Priyanka Rani v. Government of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s candidature for Nursing Officer due to non-compliance with the prescribed validity period of OBC (NCL) certificates as mandated by the recruitment advertisement and official notices.
Kumer Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court mitigated a BSF employee's dismissal for overstaying leave and false information to reinstatement with penalty, emphasizing absence of mala fide intent and socio-economic context.
Sandeep Raman Pawar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the State Government's sanction of a modified development plan within the permissible extended period and validated the constitution of the Pune Metropolitan Planning Committee, dismissing challenges to the final notification.
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Charu Ashok Khandal
The Bombay High Court upheld the MACT's award of Rs. 62.2 lakhs compensation for death due to accident-induced quadriplegia, affirming the nexus between injury and death and the admissibility of disability certificates as public documents.
Pradeep Agarwal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where a plea of fraud was already taken in the original securitization application, amendment to add the same plea may be refused, but the party can clarify it in replication, and the Tribunal shall consider it on merits.
Collector of Land Acquisition v. M/S Andaman Timber Industries
The Supreme Court held that a perpetual license under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Regulation confers an interest in land entitling the licensee to compensation upon acquisition, and dismissed the review petition challenging this principle.
Southindian Bank Ltd v. Allindia Bank Deposit & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award revising fallback wages and benefits of daily Deposit Collectors employed by banks, affirming their status as workmen and the Tribunal's jurisdiction to fix fair wages reflecting cost of living and performance standards.
Sugee Developers v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside the order recognizing tenancy rights over a small enclosed space under a staircase for lack of pre-1996 occupation proof, emphasizing strict adherence to Government Resolution requirements and imposing exemplary costs for abuse of process.
delivered on: 13th November, 2013 MAC.APP. No.414/2012 v. CORAM:
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by setting aside the counsel fee award, upheld 30% future prospects addition for a deceased aged 50 years and 4 days, and refused recovery rights against the driver due to lack of proof of licence invalidity.