Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mars Incorporated v. The Registrar of Trademarks & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the time to file a counter-statement under Section 21(2) of the Trade Marks Act begins from actual receipt of the Notice of Opposition, not from the date of sending, and set aside the abandonment of the appellant's trademark application due to non-service.
Glanbia Performance Nutrition Limited v. Hercules Nutra Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent’s trademark registration for 'ON' in class 5, holding it deceptively similar to the petitioner’s prior used and registered mark, and ordered its removal from the register.
Railtech Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate a contract dispute between Railtech Technologies Pvt Ltd and the Union of India under the arbitration clause of their contract.
Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat v. Navneet Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's petition and upheld the Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of the respondent's candidature under the EWS category despite delayed submission of the certificate due to COVID-19 lockdown, mandating compliance including reservation of a vacancy.
Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh; Ms. Laavanya Kaushik; Ms. Aliza Alam; Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat v. Ravi Pratap
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's delayed writ petition challenging the CAT's order granting appointment and consequential benefits to the respondent, refusing to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 due to unexplained delay.
Gagan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of August 1st as the cut-off date for age eligibility in UPSC Civil Services Examinations, dismissing the petitioners' challenge based on settled Supreme Court precedent.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Gaurav Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT order for a fresh medical examination and appointment due to unexplained delay and laches, emphasizing the need for prompt compliance in employment-related matters.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Kamlesh Kumar Meena
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT order for a fresh medical examination due to unexplained and inordinate delay, emphasizing that delay and laches are fatal to such petitions.
Deepak Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief against dismissal orders of Air Force personnel involved in unauthorized business activities, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference in such disciplinary matters.
Staff Selection Commission and Anr v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination of a candidate declared unfit due to hypertension and other medical issues, emphasizing the need for adequate observation and resolving conflicting medical reports.
P-2-3 v. Kamalini Nagrajan Dutt
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting retrospective regularization of ad hoc promotions due to UPSC's non-participation, clarifying that such relief is an exception and not a general rule.
Jai Chand v. Union of India through Ministry of Defence & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek relief before the Armed Forces Tribunal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Chime Financial, Inc. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against refusal of trademark registration under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, holding that dissimilarity of goods/services and absence of likelihood of confusion must be individually assessed.
Star India Private Limited v. Magicwin.Games & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Star India against rogue websites for unauthorized streaming of ICC T20 World Cup 2024 content, decreeing the suit without trial due to defendants’ default.
Sh Mukesh Kumar v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
Delhi High Court directed restoration of electricity supply to a petitioner in possession making regular payments without requiring a No Objection Certificate from the registered consumer, without adjudicating property rights.
Chander Prakash Kapur v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-domestic classification of electricity usage for a property used as a Paying Guest accommodation, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the assessment orders.
Neeti Sharma v. Saranjit Singh
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 223 BNSS, in Section 138 NI Act cases, the Magistrate may issue notice to the accused without prior examination of the complainant on oath, dismissing the petition challenging such notice.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Lmus Deepak Gaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting broadbanding of disability pension for Seizure Disorder to a Navy Musician, holding the disability attributable to military service despite peace area deployment.
Rahul Sood v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed summons against an independent director under Section 141 NI Act, holding that mere directorship without specific allegations of responsibility is insufficient for vicarious liability.
M/S Siddhartha Construction Co. v. India Tourism Development Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that the sole arbitrator was invalidly appointed by an ineligible party under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without an express written waiver.