Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hukam Singh v. Gulshan Kumar Gambhir
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession and mesne profits in favor of a purchaser in possession under an agreement to sell, rejecting the seller's claims of fraud and illiteracy.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Quantum Coders Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's interpretation of Section 10A, allowing the assessee's full deduction claim for software export income despite approval certificate timing, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Godrej Consumer Products Ltd v. Controller of Legal Metrology
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petitions seeking quashing of criminal complaints against Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. for alleged violations of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, holding that disputed factual issues and the existence of an offence preclude interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at the interlocutory stage.
P P Jewellers Pvt Ltd v. Modern New Kapoor Jewellers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 81.72 lakhs with interest where the defendant failed to file an application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Dhan Raj Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's rejection of dismissal approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act due to unfair enquiry and non-payment of one month's wages, directing family pension to the deceased employee's widow.
Shri Madan Singh and Ors. v. Ladli Prasad and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' claim of adverse possession over property No. 476, upholding the respondents' ownership and possession rights based on documentary evidence and prior decrees.
Rajinder Singh v. Mahinder Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the appellant's rights over a passage within the respondent's property are limited to ingress and egress without rights to alter or use it otherwise, and no easementary rights were established.
Rajan v. Poonam Khullar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that the principle of owelty does not apply where a Will specifically divides property into distinct portions, and no substantial question of law arises.
Shri Shiv Paul Sagar v. Smt. Vishakha Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that service of summons in a possession suit suffices as valid notice terminating a monthly tenancy outside rent control protection, dismissing the tenant's appeal against eviction.
Sanjay v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery based on reliable victim identification but reduced the sentence as disproportionate.
AMANINDER SINGH VERKA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Delhi High Court allowed an SC candidate’s writ petition challenging flawed recruitment procedures and directed his absorption as a trainee pilot subject to qualifying remaining tests and medical fitness.
Sunil Srivastava v. Arun Nayyar
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on the landlord's bonafide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing the tenant's revision petition for lack of jurisdictional error or illegality.
Subhash Jain v. Ravi Sehgal
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that inheritance does not trigger the five-year bar under Section 14(6) of the Delhi Rent Control Act and that the tenant failed to raise triable issues.
M/S Royal Palace in Hotel v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi courts have territorial jurisdiction to try offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the cheque is presented and dishonoured within Delhi, even if the cheque is drawn on a bank outside Delhi.
Smt Anita v. UCO Bank
The Delhi High Court directed UCO Bank to release the fixed deposit amount along with interest to the petitioner widow for purchasing land after dismissing her earlier application before the Tribunal.
Prem Kumar @ Kalu & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
Delhi High Court held that refusal to participate in TIP justifies adverse inference of identification, and a toy pistol does not attract Section 397 IPC, modifying conviction accordingly.
Zeeshan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Zeeshan for attempt to murder a police constable by firing at him with a country-made pistol, possession of unauthorized arms, and obstructing police, affirming the sufficiency of evidence to prove intention under Section 307 IPC.
Pernod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. v. Special Director of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by Pernod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. and Sunil Mehdiratta, setting aside penalties under FERA for alleged misdeclaration of imported alcoholic concentrates, holding that no violation occurred as foreign exchange was properly utilized and goods correctly classified.
Tarun Garg v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove identification and recovery of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
Mohd Israr Qureshi v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for armed robbery based on reliable identification, recovery of stolen property, and adverse inference from refusal to participate in Test Identification Parade.