Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ram Kishor Arora v. Rohit Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed recall of coercive measures against the petitioner under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 upon his undertaking to appear physically before the NCDRC and comply with directions.
Resurgent Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Strum Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an application for restoration of a dismissed Order VII Rule 10 CPC application can be considered on merits despite being moved under an incorrect provision, directing the trial court to decide it accordingly.
M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD v. M/S SKYLARK BUILDTECH LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a non-commercial suit due to non-supply of complete plaint and documents, emphasizing deciding cases on merits over technicalities.
CONCEPTUM LOGISTICS INDIA PVT LTD v. SAMRAJAYA GLOBAL SHIPPING SERVICES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend a summary suit, holding that the defence of coercion was a belated, unsubstantiated claim lacking triable issues, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment.
Vinod @ Binnu v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case where circumstantial evidence and forensic recovery of the weapon at the accused's instance established a strong prosecution case.
Saurabh v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a young accused in a mobile phone theft case where the prosecution did not raise serious objections and the location evidence was inconclusive.
Sagir v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed furlough to a long-term convict despite delayed surrender, emphasizing reformative principles and the prisoner's overall good conduct.
Mohd. Saalim Qureshi v. Ms. Naghma
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for failure to consider adultery allegations, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
Zhuhai Hansen Technology Co Ltd v. Aksh Optifibre Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent settlement agreement superseding original contracts extinguishes the arbitration clause therein, and thus refused to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
Vijender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within three weeks and stayed the transfer pending such decision due to his son's serious medical condition.
Prabhjot Kaur v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of reservation for women in a government post as per the advertisement issued before roster amendments, holding that recruitment rules cannot be changed midway through the process.
R. Nagaraj v. Rajmani
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in remanding a second appeal for fresh trial on limitation without deciding the substantial question of law, restoring the dismissal of a suit barred by limitation.
NEHA ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX
The Supreme Court held that input tax credit cannot be claimed on sales turnover exempt under section 7(c) of the Uttar Pradesh VAT Act, 2008, as prohibited by section 13(7), dismissing the dealer’s appeal.
EPC Constructions India Limited Through Its Liquidator - Abhijit Guhathakurta v. M/s Matix Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited
The Supreme Court held that holders of cumulative redeemable preference shares are shareholders and not financial creditors under the IBC, and thus cannot initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7.
Mrs Suvarna Vasant Bhise & Ors. v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the competent authority under the National Highways Act has no jurisdiction to decide apportionment disputes of compensation and set aside the illegal disbursement of compensation, directing referral to the civil court and recovery of the amount.
Nivritti Pandurang Nale v. Uttam Ganu Nale & Ors.
The court rejected the adoption claim due to lack of proof of essential adoption elements and held that the suit properties shall be equally partitioned among plaintiffs and defendant no. 2.
Shri Shamrao Nanaso Shingan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that failure to acquire land within the statutory period under MRTP Act causes lapse of reservation, rendering rejection of development plans illegal and directed authorities to sanction the petitioner's plans.
Sunil Laxman Dond v. Commissioner Nashik Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court held that failure to acquire land within the statutory period after purchase notice under Section 127 MRTP Act causes lapse of reservation, and directed the State to notify the lapse, allowing the landowners to develop their land.
Latika Sarejrao Bhosale v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a Gram Panchayat's unanimous revocation of a mining NOC based on environmental and public interest grounds is valid and dismissed the petition seeking to reinstate mining operations.
Contract for Emergency Medical Services v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Emergency Medical Services tender process and dismissed the PIL challenging the contract award, emphasizing limited judicial interference in fair and transparent administrative decisions.