Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mantola Co-operative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus funds invested in fixed deposits is taxable under income from other sources and not exempt under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Naveen v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a husband under Sections 498A and 304B IPC for dowry death, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment related to dowry demands beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S. SURVI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. OM BUILDERS
The Delhi High Court granted a decree for recovery of Rs. 24,24,706/- in favor of the plaintiff against the ex parte defendant for breach of subcontract terms and non-payment.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Raghubir Singh Garg
The Delhi High Court held that recording the satisfaction note under Section 158BD after passing the block assessment order under Section 158BC against the searched person does not invalidate block assessment proceedings against another person.
Virjesh Kumar Gupta v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a defendant disputing execution of loan documents is not entitled to discharge or mandatory expert examination of signatures at the preliminary stage, and such issues are to be decided on evidence at the final stage.
Jitender & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC on the ground of a bona fide settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rajeev Bakshi v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 285 and 338 IPC on the basis of a genuine settlement between the petitioner and the deceased's legal representatives at the investigation stage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Vikas Thawani & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of a bona fide settlement and the complainant's disinterest in prosecution, relying on its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Noor Jahan and Ors. v. Harbir Singh and Ors.
A second execution petition is maintainable to recall an earlier dismissal as satisfied if the factual basis for satisfaction was mistaken or the agreement failed to materialize.
Lalit Kumar Modi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of Lalit Kumar Modi's passport under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act for non-compliance with summons issued during FEMA investigations, affirming the exercise of power in public interest with due process.
Ashok Kapoor & Ors. v. Vidya Shankar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under bona fide requirement grounds, ruling that an agreement to sell does not confer ownership or prevent eviction without conveyance.
Pawan Kumar & Anr. v. Sat Narain Kaushik (Deceased) through LRs & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, finding the landlord's bona fide requirement of the premises for residential use was established despite tenant's objections.
Sh. Santanu Sur v. Gail India Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a writ petition for refund of bond money deducted under a contract was barred by limitation and not maintainable, emphasizing that recovery of money is a civil remedy not ordinarily entertained under writ jurisdiction.
Anwar Parvez v. Mohd Faheem & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's amendment application to add rendition of accounts relief, holding that Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits such amendments before framing of issues to prevent injustice.
Sanjay Bansal v. Monika Gupta
The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance of an Agreement to Sell where the vendor failed to execute the Sale Deed despite receipt of consideration and the vendee's readiness to perform.
Rekha Chopra v. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur
The Delhi High Court held that a bank is not obliged to disclose customer information under the RTI Act unless the applicant is authorized or larger public interest justifies disclosure, affirming fiduciary exemption under Section 8.
PT. MUNSHI RAM & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking enhancement of damages for breach of contract due to insufficient pleading and evidence supporting the claimed amount.
Energy Savers India Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Sh. Ajit Lal Tandon
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order restoring a suit dismissed in default due to an inadvertent error, emphasizing disposal on merits over technicalities.
Prithvi Singh v. Azadpur Agriculture Produce Market Committee
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order condoning a 4½ month delay in filing the written statement, holding that the prescribed period under CPC is directory and delay can be condoned on sufficient cause without mala fide intent.
Sudesh Kumar Gupta v. M/S. Nirula Handicraft Bazar Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition to amend the leave to defend application after the statutory period, reaffirming the sanctity of the 15-day limit and condemning repeated frivolous delays in bonafide necessity eviction proceedings.