Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shyam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 394 IPC based on credible sole testimony despite absence of independent witnesses and medical examination, emphasizing quality of evidence over quantity.
Sonu v. Premlata
The Delhi High Court upheld a maintenance award of ₹18,000 per month under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, emphasizing that courts may infer true income through guesswork when a spouse suppresses financial details.
Sonu v. Premlata
The Delhi High Court upheld a maintenance pendente lite award of ₹18,000 per month to a wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, finding the husband concealed income and emphasizing courts may estimate income where full disclosure is lacking.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy, and the DGFT cannot exclude them by adding conditions beyond the policy's plain language.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits and the DGFT cannot exclude them by amending the Foreign Trade Policy through interpretation.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits and that DGFT cannot exclude them by amending the Foreign Trade Policy through interpretation.
Harish Chander v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken or compensation not paid within five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that subsequent amendment ordinances cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.
Deluxe Dentelles Pvt. Ltd. v. Ishpinder Kochhar
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease deed creates a month-to-month tenancy terminable by 15 days' notice, and a decree on admission for possession was rightly granted where rent escalation beyond ₹3,500 was admitted, excluding the tenancy from Rent Control Act protection.
Deluxe Dentelles Pvt. Ltd. v. Ishpinder Kochhar
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease deed creates a month-to-month tenancy terminable by 15 days' notice, and upheld a decree on admission for possession where rent exceeded ₹3,500 per month, excluding the tenancy from rent control protections.
MANKIND PHARMA LTD v. CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
The Delhi High Court granted injunction restraining use of the deceptively similar trademark 'MECOKIND PLUS' in pharmaceutical products, affirming stricter protection for prior registered marks incorporating generic words with acquired distinctiveness.
Ramesh Chand Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for letters of administration over an intestate estate due to family acrimony and failed mediation, directing the parties to seek partition instead.
Ms M.V.Nordlake GmbH v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that under the amended Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, a shipowner's right to limit liability is absolute and not subject to proof of personal fault or recklessness, allowing constitution of a limitation fund at an interim stage.
Archana Bhagwan Jaswani v. Empire Silk Weaving Industries
The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award, ruling that an explicit arbitration agreement and agreed exclusion of legal representation under Chamber bye-laws preclude jurisdictional challenges and do not vitiate the award.
Shri Ram Pratap Goel v. M/S Manu Enterprises & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that heirs and persons continuing a deceased sole proprietor's business are jointly liable to pay outstanding debts evidenced by post-dated cheques and business records, awarding recovery with interest to the plaintiff.
Vinod Kumar Bakshi v. Rajan Kapoor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree on admission based on the appellant's prior admission of a lease deed, estopping him from denying plaintiffs' ownership and tenancy rights in the suit property.
Anand Sagar v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the fine imposed under Section 350 Cr.P.C. on a police officer for non-appearance, holding that the provision applies only to witnesses and mandates an opportunity of hearing before penalty.
Rajender Singh v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court allowed early release of compensation funds deposited as FDR under a Lok Adalat award, setting aside the Tribunal's refusal, based on the petitioner's genuine financial need.
Dinesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the rejection of a candidate's appointment based on handwriting mismatch after forensic examination confirmed the handwriting matched, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.
Vijay Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of the candidate after forensic confirmation of thumb impression matching, overruling rejection based on handwriting/signature mismatch.
Yogesh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Tribunal's order rejecting candidature on handwriting mismatch after forensic thumb impression verification confirmed the petitioner's identity, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.