Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kashyapi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr v. K.D.K. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
The High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of plaint without hearing the defendants and directed fresh hearing in accordance with natural justice.
Falcon Licensing Limited v. PRI Enterprises Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove a trademark registered in bad faith and non-use, affirming prior user rights and condemning trademark squatting under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act.
Pawan Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that a warning punishment for overstaying furlough does not bar granting subsequent furlough, emphasizing the reformatory purpose of furlough and the petitioner's prior good conduct.
Manjula v. State of NCT Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted to accused under Section 20 NDPS Act due to her absence during raid and prima facie irregularities in investigation documents.
J. G’S DEPARTMENTAL STORE v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 60(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18 as it exceeded the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and opportunity to respond.
FDC LIMITED v. PALSONS DERMA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of the prior user plaintiff restraining the defendant from using a deceptively similar trademark, emphasizing the superiority of prior user rights over registered rights in passing off actions.
Devendri v. Ajay Pawar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to reconsider the stay of a partition suit under Section 10 CPC after comparing issues with a pending Bulandshahr suit and hearing both parties.
Pinki v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to accused in an interstate child trafficking racket, emphasizing stringent judicial scrutiny in such serious offences to protect victims and ensure effective prosecution.
Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment allowing a suit based on unproven oral partition and will, reinstating the dismissal of the suit by lower courts for lack of evidence and non-joinder of necessary parties.
Varshatai v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the lawful use of Urdu alongside Marathi on a Municipal Council signboard, affirming constitutional recognition of multiple official languages and dismissing the appellant's challenge under Maharashtra's official language laws.
JANSHRUTI (PEOPLE’S VOICE) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 498A IPC, dismissed the petition seeking gender-neutral reforms, and emphasized judicial restraint in legislative matters despite concerns of misuse.
Suresh Kumar Agarwal v. M/s. Haldia Steels Limited & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a belated complaint alleging breach of contract without cognizable offence cannot sustain criminal proceedings and set aside the High Court’s order directing further investigation.
Nikhila Divyang Mehta & Anr. v. Hitesh P. Sanghvi & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a suit for declaration of a Will and Codicil filed beyond the three-year limitation period is barred by limitation and the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without requiring evidence.
Technova Imaging Systems Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that in amalgamation cases where no carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation under Section 72A is claimed, the amalgamated company can adjust written down value of assets based on depreciation actually allowed without Central Government approval.
Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. & Anr. v. Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld MAHAGENCO's rejection of the petitioner's bid and forfeiture of EMD, holding that BPSCPL is a Government entity or independent power producer whose blacklisting disqualified the petitioner under the tender terms.
Ramchandra Jakappa Nandavadekar & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The High Court held that members cannot be removed from a cooperative society's voters list without following statutory procedure, allowing excluded members to vote without stalling ongoing elections.
B.M.E.’s Bhagyawan Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside orders condoning an 11-year delay in filing an appeal under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, holding that mere ignorance without due diligence does not constitute sufficient cause.
wp1102024 f79fc216
The Bombay High Court issued procedural directions regarding case listings, removal of office objections, continuation of interim orders, and affidavit filings for upcoming hearings.
VF Brands India Private Limited & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet against VF Brands and its directors, holding that the dispute is contractual and already adjudicated by arbitration, and that criminal proceedings are an abuse of process without prima facie evidence of offences.
Urmiladevi Mahavirprasad Jain v. Punjab National Bank
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition quashing DRAT's pre-deposit order, holding that the Bank cannot renege on a settlement backed by no-dues certificates and release deeds, and restored the appeal for hearing on merits without pre-deposit.