Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S V AND L DIAGNOSTICS CENTRE LLP v. M/S CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD
Delhi High Court vacated interim stay on lender's repossession of hypothecated medical equipment due to borrower's failure to initiate arbitration and appointed Receiver and Arbitrator to resolve disputes.
M/S JAI OPTICAL v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without considering the petitioner's medical adjournment request, emphasizing the necessity of empathetic consideration of such requests and adherence to natural justice.
M/S GMT GARMENTS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a show cause notice under the 'additional notices' tab on the GST portal does not constitute valid service, condoned delay in filing appeal due to lack of notice, and directed the appeal to be heard on merits.
Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the conduct of Bar Association elections under appointed Election Committees, upheld the requirement of valid Proximity Cards for candidates, and dismissed applications for fresh cards and impleadment after elections concluded.
M/S RAJ INTERNATIONAL v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST
The Delhi High Court held that failure to consider written submissions and ineffective communication of personal hearing notices under the CGST Act violates natural justice, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.
Delhi Development Authority v. Raheja Developers Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Development Authority, as the registered electricity consumer, is liable to pay outstanding electricity dues for the Transit Camp, and Raheja Developers Limited is not liable under the development agreement.
Shri Vinay Khanna v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted cross-examination of an attesting witness with contradictory affidavits in a testamentary case, emphasizing the strict compliance required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act for valid Will execution.
M/S Montage Enterprises Private Limited v. Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi North
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order, holding that the petitioners' delay and availability of statutory appellate remedies precluded interference under Article 226.
DY COMDT MANISH SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending resignation application within two weeks and restrained coercive action against him pending the decision.
M/S Sri Venkateswara Constructions v. State of Odisha & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the petitioner’s tender bid by affirming reasonable interpretation of income tax and GST compliance requirements, setting aside the High Court’s order directing a fresh tender.
SHAKUNTLA DEVI v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the mother-in-law for abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC based on credible evidence of dowry-related cruelty leading to the deceased's suicide.
Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association v. Union of India
The Supreme Court directed continuation of scrutiny and fair allotment of plots in Okhla Enclave, permitting general category allottees multiple claims and ordering State action to optimize land use and resolve pending disputes.
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SURENDRA PATWA
The Supreme Court held that natural justice applies to administrative classification of bank frauds but not to FIR registration, restoring criminal proceedings quashed by High Courts for non-compliance with audi alteram partem in administrative actions.
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest v. Suresh Mathew
The Supreme Court upheld the lawful cancellation and re-tendering of a government contract, emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender matters absent mala fides or arbitrariness.
Eknath Krishna Kadam v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and robbery based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and failure to explain whereabouts under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Ananda Vishnu Salvi v. The Chief Officer
The Bombay High Court held that a government servant with 9 years and 9 months service is entitled to pension by rounding off service under Rule 110(3) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and granted pension with interest on delayed payments.
Shaikh Mohammad Azahar v. Ishwar Pralhad Dham
The Bombay High Court held that Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC applies to revocation proceedings under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, allowing courts to reject sham revocation applications at the threshold.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the GST Appellate Tribunal has inherent jurisdiction to grant interim relief including stay of recovery, and directed the petitioner to seek such relief before the Tribunal instead of the High Court.
Manoj Kumar Yadav v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a vehicle used merely as a pilot vehicle without carrying illicit liquor is not liable for confiscation under the Delhi Excise Act and ordered its release on superdari.
Anand Katiyar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging recruitment rules and pay scale of Assistant Public Prosecutor, holding that the remedy lies before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.