Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S SCL-CRC21B JV v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an order refusing to admit documents in arbitration proceedings is a procedural order, not an interim award, and thus not challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
PNSC Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a Sole Arbitrator without delving into merits or factual disputes.
Faizaan Tak v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for suspension of sentence of a rape convict, holding that suspension should not be granted without patent infirmity in conviction and that delay in FIR is not fatal in sexual offence cases.
Angad Singh v. The Chairperson NDMC & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Town Vending Committee's survey finding Mr. Kamlesh Kumar as the eligible vendor at Shop No. 25, directing Mr. Angad Singh to vacate the site and comply with vending regulations.
Roshan and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant.
Abhiruchi Kant Aswal & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
SARR Freights Corporation & Anr. v. Argo Coral Maritime Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that Indian courts have jurisdiction to grant anti-arbitration injunctions against oppressive foreign seated arbitration proceedings where no valid arbitration agreement exists and part cause of action arises in India.
Pankaj Vaid v. ICICI Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the valid termination of an employee who accepted payment in lieu of notice, dismissing his claims for reinstatement and damages for alleged arbitrary termination.
Moti Lal v. Prem Chand
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and decreed recovery of Rs.4,90,000/- with interest, holding that the admitted loan requires the defendant to prove repayment, which he failed to do.
Chanchal Garg v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a forgery case involving bank guarantee cancellation, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and that bail courts are not forums for money recovery.
Ganesh Prabhu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a forgery case due to the necessity of custodial interrogation and the accused's failure to cooperate with the investigation.
Pratibha Thakur v. Govt of NCT Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to accused involved in a large-scale railway job fraud and forgery, as custodial interrogation was necessary and the accused failed to establish innocence or victimhood.
Obinna Theodore Onyeneto v. Foreigners Regional Registration Office & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a private university is amenable to writ jurisdiction only for public duties, dismissed the petitioner’s claim for visa extension and compensation due to failure to complete the course and overstay, affirming the sovereign power of the government to regulate visas and deport foreign nationals.
Sh. Vishwraj v. Union of India
The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the claimant failed to prove lawful travel and the incident was deliberate self-harm, while condoning delay in filing the appeal.
Smt. Asha Devi & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the compensation claim, holding that absence of a ticket is not conclusive against bona fide passenger status and that accidental fall from train qualifies as an "untoward incident" under the Railways Act.
The State v. Vijay Tyagi & Ors.
The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case, holding that prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment linked to dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt, and statutory presumption under Section 113B IEA did not arise.
Raj Kumar Gupta v. Radhey Shyam Gupta
The High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's objection to the marking of a photograph during cross-examination, holding that relevancy of evidence is to be decided after full evidence is led.
Kent RO Systems Ltd & Anr. v. Kanchan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Plaintiffs restraining Defendants from infringing the well-known trademark 'KENT' and registered design of water purifiers, holding that unauthorized use of identical or deceptively similar marks and designs constitutes infringement.
Sandeep Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs ICD Patparganj
The Delhi High Court declined to quash a time-barred Show Cause Notice under the Customs Act, directing the authority to consider the petitioner's limitation objections before proceeding.
Deepak Talwar v. Income Tax Office
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to admit additional documents inadvertently omitted from the original Complaint, emphasizing the primacy of justice over procedural technicalities.