Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes lie with the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified pension calculation rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension payments to employees who voluntarily retired under DISCOMS’ special schemes are payable by the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the interpretation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that pension payments for voluntary retirees under DISCOMs’ SVRS are payable by the DISCOMs, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pensionary benefits under Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are payable by DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine liabilities.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension benefits for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are not payable from the Pension Trust, mandated constitution of arbitral tribunals to determine additional employer contributions, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes by electricity DISCOMS are not payable from the Pension Trust but initially by DISCOMS, and clarified the correct interpretation of qualifying service and pension rules under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liability for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes lies with the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.
Vijaymala Sidling Doijad v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a counter-claim filed after settlement of issues and recording of evidence is generally impermissible and set aside the trial court's order allowing such a belated counter-claim.
Vishal v. The State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable last-seen evidence and discrepancies in recovery and motive, emphasizing the need for corroboration in circumstantial cases.
st July, 2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ANR. ..... Through Mr.Gagan Mathur & Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocates. v. SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN MEENA .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of delayed reversion orders reverting employees to lower grades, holding that long acquiescence and known qualifications preclude retrospective reversion.
Dilip Lalchand Porwal v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court held that the State Human Rights Commission lacks jurisdiction over civil property disputes and quashed its order directing compliance under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Ashok Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that AICTE clarifications imposing a first class Master's degree requirement cannot retrospectively deny promotion rights under the original 1999 circular, allowing petitioners' promotion to Lecturer (Selection Grade).
Reeta Mukesh Sehgal v. Union Bharat Sabha & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld termination of a college Principal for deliberate alteration of service records and misconduct involving moral turpitude, affirming the proportionality of disciplinary punishment and limited scope of judicial review.
ST MARKS SR SEC PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR v. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the Director of Education's order invalidating a 15% tuition fee increase for air conditioning expenses and affirmed the requirement for schools to maintain a separate depreciation reserve fund account before charging development fees.
Tulshiram T. Patil v. Wellman Hindustan Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld a binding industrial settlement resolving wage and gratuity claims of workers, rejecting allegations of fraud and delay in raising objections.
Council of the Instt. of Chartered Accountants of India v. Kailash Chander Agarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action removing a Chartered Accountant from the professional register for five years for issuing misleading certificates without verifying actual receipt of share money.
Mahesh Purshottam Maurya v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a municipal notice under Section 351 MMC Act, holding that plaintiffs failed to prove the legality of the disputed structure.
Anil Joginder Sachdev v. Balasaheb Hiralal Zad
The Court held that eviction on ground of default in rent was not maintainable due to premature suit filing before expiry of statutory notice period, but upheld eviction for unauthorized permanent construction and injury to premises under the Bombay Rent Act.
Vijay Shankar Patil and Others v. UCO Bank
The Bombay High Court held that Industrial Tribunals have jurisdiction to award interest on delayed payment of dues under an Award, directing UCO Bank to pay 6% interest on back wages from the date they became due until actual payment.
Mr. Shivam Tiwari v. Rohtash Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the Tribunal's order permitting belated pay refixation under the ACP Scheme, holding that the option had to be exercised within the prescribed time and delay barred the claim.