Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dr.Jose Verghese, Mr.Ashwani K.Sakhuja and Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocates. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed Mount Carmel School Society's appeal and contempt petition, holding that prior final orders on land allotment bar further challenge and that construction commenced before status quo order cannot be restrained.
Dr.Jose Verghese, Mr.Ashwani K.Sakhuja and Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocates. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed Mount Carmel School Society's appeal seeking stay of construction on disputed land, holding the matter barred by res judicata and no prima facie case for injunction.
Baleshwar Dayal Jaiswal v. Bank of India
The Supreme Court held that the Appellate Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act has the power to condone delay in filing appeals by incorporating the proviso to Section 20(3) of the RDB Act, overruling contrary High Court decisions.
Indian Rare Earths Ltd. v. Unique Builders Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld a non-speaking arbitral Award, ruling that absence of reasons alone is insufficient to set aside an Award under section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.
Snehasish Mukherjee v. Union of India
The Supreme Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to consider and respond to the petitioner’s pending representations and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Pankaj Murgai v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a revision petition under Section 138 NI Act as settled and acquitted the petitioner following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Som Nath v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of alternate plot allotment based on a registered relinquishment deed, holding that disputed factual issues require trial in a civil suit.
M/S SHREEJEE NESTBUILD PVT. LTD. & ORS v. STATE AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement at the investigation stage, emphasizing the cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in commercial disputes.
Prabhash Chand Jain v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and payment of dues, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in predominantly civil disputes.
Parvender Kumar & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in such cases.
Mylan Inc and Ors v. Drugs Controller General of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court Division Bench modified the Single Judge's order on advance notice for pharmaceutical product launch, accepting prior regulatory approval as sufficient compliance and disposed of the appeals without expressing views on merits.
Sushil v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexually assaulting a minor child, relying on credible child testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.
Ram Dayal & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a demolition notice, directing maintenance of status quo pending appeal disposal and granting liberty to seek remedies if the appeal is decided adversely.
Harvinder Singh Rana v. National Seed Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that employees of a government-owned corporation are not entitled to HRA if their spouse has government accommodation, and recovery of excess HRA paid is lawful despite delay in challenge.
Naresh Kumar v. State Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Neeraj @ Kamal Grover v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Kushal Rajora v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 419/420/467/468/471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Nadeem Akhtar & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 341, 354, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC as guided by Supreme Court precedents.
Delhi Development Authority v. Arun Mishra
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over eviction proceedings under the Public Premises Act and vacated the interim stay granted by the Tribunal, directing the respondent to pursue statutory remedies.
Union of India and Ors. v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order quashing disciplinary penalty imposed without valid presidential approval, emphasizing the non-delegable nature of discretionary powers under CCS (Pension) Rules.