Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vijay Kumar Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to Vijay Kumar Sharma, holding him as mastermind of large-scale investor cheating and denying bail due to gravity of offences and risk to investigation.
Adila Healthcare Ltd v. Seven Oak Healthcare Pvt Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntary out-of-court settlement reached by the parties during the pendency of the suit.
Sanjay Kumar Bhamri v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the trial court’s decision that the suit for damages was barred by limitation and failed on merits due to lack of proof of loss.
ASHISH GOPALDAS ALIAS GOPIKISAN LOHIYA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in a criminal case, emphasizing his absence from the incident location and requiring cooperation with the investigation.
Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd. v. Custodian & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the Special Court's order disposing of attached tenancy rights at the highest offer to satisfy liabilities under the Special Courts Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge and modifying the deposit terms in the interest of justice.
A.N. Sachdeva by LRs. & Ors. v. Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that prior continuous service in predecessor universities must be counted as qualifying service for pension under an upwardly revised pension scheme, disallowing arbitrary discrimination against pre-2002 retirees.
Arjun v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 307 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties related by family, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised in such cases where the likelihood of conviction is remote.
Vijay Kumar v. National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 304A IPC based on a genuine settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve ends of justice.
Yashwant Singh v. Ashutosh Verma
The Delhi High Court permitted the plaintiff to lease out portions of the disputed property under strict conditions to ensure rental proceeds are used for bank loan repayment despite ongoing litigation and prior restraint orders.
Tej Pal Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the main accused in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, holding that the serious nature of offences and risk of tampering with evidence precluded bail.
Banwari Lal Sharma v. The Land Acquisition Collector and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Land Acquisition Collector to dispose of the petitioner's representation for a No Objection Certificate in accordance with a recent Division Bench judgment within two weeks.
Neeraj Bahl v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences arising from family disputes.
Ravinder Kumar and Ors. v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Ekta Arora v. Ajay Arora & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a wife cannot claim residence rights in a property owned solely by her mother-in-law during her lifetime under the Domestic Violence Act, dismissing the petition challenging the appellate court's order setting aside the trial court's residence order.
Jitender Chauhan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences where continuation of proceedings would be futile.
Piyush Arora & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute under Sections 452, 323, 427, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and restore harmony.
Shiv Charan v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vijay Goel v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 448, 380, 451, and 506 IPC based on a bona fide compromise between parties, applying principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process of law.
Vishal Yadav & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Pradeep Kumar Bajaj v. State of NCT of Delhi
The High Court declined to interfere under Section 482 CrPC, directing the petitioner to raise discharge pleas before the trial court at the charge framing stage, emphasizing the availability of alternate remedy.