Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vilas Damu Shinde v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
The Bombay High Court held that acceptance of Section 4(1) notice by one co-owner on behalf of others validates land acquisition, dismissing the petitioners' challenge but directing payment of interest on compensation.
Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to reasonable doubt arising from forensic and testimonial evidence.
Parbhati Devi & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dowry cruelty under Section 498A IPC but acquitted the accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to insufficient evidence, modifying sentences to time served.
Rohan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer (International Taxation)-3
The Bombay High Court held that for capital gains tax on property acquired by will, indexation benefit must be computed from the year the previous owner first held the asset, entitling the petitioner to refund of excess tax deducted at source with interest.
Ali Mohd. Subrati Khan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld convictions for rape based on the credible sole testimony of the prosecutrix supported by medical and chemical evidence, affirming that absence of a test identification parade does not vitiate in-court identification.
Dinesh Kumar Singh & Ors. v. Sainath Education Trust & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that pay scale revisions for private school employees under the MEPS Act require statutory amendment of rules and cannot be effected solely by Government Resolutions, declining a larger Bench reference.
Usha Eswar v. Rajeshwari Menon & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that an advance ruling by the Authority for Advance Ruling is binding on the applicant and revenue unless law or facts change, and quashed reassessment notices issued relying on a subsequent ruling in another case without such change.
National Building Construction Corporation v. M/s Sharma Enterprises
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award except for the interest component, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited and the contract barred pendente lite interest.
Azizur Rehman Gulam Rasool v. M/s. Radio Restaurant
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitral award on grounds of procedural and substantive infirmities, upholding the award and directing possession to be handed over to the partnership firm.
Modi Business Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. DC (IT) Spl. Rg. 19, Bombay
The Bombay High Court held that the appellant's business had commenced during AY 1992-93, allowing set-off of interest expenditure against interest income from lending borrowed funds, reversing the ITAT's order.
Ajay Kumar Bhagat and Ors. v. B.L. Sherwal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition for non-compliance of an interim order due to delay beyond the one-year limitation period under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Bank of Baroda v. Devshi Valji Kundadia
The Bombay High Court upheld the industrial tribunal’s setting aside of a bank employee’s dismissal for misappropriation due to perverse enquiry findings and unreliable evidence, directing reinstatement with 60% backwages.
Ari Singh (Deceased) Thr. LRs v. UOI
The Delhi High Court dismissed a restoration application filed after a 25-year delay due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay and upheld the dismissal of the original appeal for default.
Gammon India Limited v. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on claims relating to electricity charges, price variation, and excavation costs, affirming limited judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Rajveer Sharma v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are maintainable against the NTPC Pension Trust as it performs a public function, entitling retired employees to mandamus for pensionary benefits under the Scheme.
Anwar Liyakat Khan v. Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone
The High Court held that a consent decree obtained by fraud can be recalled by the court which passed it, even on application by third parties, and that the bar on suits under Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC applies to all, but does not preclude recall applications under Section 151 CPC.
Genarosa A. Annes and Ors. v. Haji Esmail Haji Essa Supariwala and Ors.
The High Court upheld eviction of tenant from part of premises after finding tenancy was split by surrender of other portions by joint tenant, rejecting plea of indivisible tenancy and invalid demand notice.
Vipin Kumar and Anr v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld UPSC's recruitment process, ruling that introducing a screening test with 50% interview weightage before commencement was lawful and not arbitrary.
Vishav Priya Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Summary Court Martial and punishment awarded for disobedience, rejecting the petitioner's challenge to jurisdiction and procedural irregularities.
Suhas Damodar Sathe v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a development agreement conferring extensive proprietary rights constitutes a conveyance under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, attracting higher stamp duty and penalty.