Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajendra Kumar Tekriwal v. M/S Unique Constrn. P. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, vacated the interim order, and directed the Arbitrator to decide all disputes including party joinder and valuation issues expeditiously.
DHARAMVIR v. STATE OF HARYANA
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and directed payment of enhanced land acquisition compensation at Rs. 90,000 per acre with statutory benefits, following its earlier precedent.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. M/S. Al Faheem Meetex Private Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the authority of the Bid Evaluation Committee to rescind its earlier recommendation and annul the tender process due to procedural irregularities before final approval by the Competent Authority.
INDIAN BANK v. M/S NIPPON ENTERPRISES SOUTH
The Supreme Court held that a bank successful in SARFAESI proceedings against an owner cannot evict a tenant without following due process under the Rent Control Act.
Shobha Singh v. National Thermal Power Corp. & Anr.
The Supreme Court directed fixation of land compensation at Rs. 480 per decimal with statutory benefits, allowing higher rates if similarly settled with others, ensuring fairness in land acquisition valuation.
Ratti Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that statutory interest on enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be paid for the entire period from dispossession, including periods of stay in proceedings caused by the claimant.
Jaidev Inder Singh v. Amritsar Improvement Trust
The Supreme Court held that land allotment rights under the Punjab Town Improvement Trust Rules apply separately to each acquisition, allowing the appellant and family to claim 250 sq. yards each despite prior allotment and exemption.
Punjab & Sind Bank v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
The Supreme Court allowed the bank to file a review petition before the High Court to challenge the deletion of a guarantor based on an alleged substitution guarantee, disposing of the appeal accordingly.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR & ORS v. SOCIETY FOR THE PROMN.OF EDN., ALLAHABAD
The Supreme Court held that an application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act is deemed registered if the tax authorities do not respond within six months, with effect from the expiry of that six-month period.
Mahendra Bhimrao Kharat v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
The Supreme Court directed timely execution and registration of allotment agreements, assured minimum carpet area allotment, and mandated formation of the Cooperative Society in a housing redevelopment dispute, disposing of the appeals with no costs.
Rajender Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
The Supreme Court remanded a land allotment dispute under the East Punjab Holdings Act for fresh hearing due to denial of opportunity of hearing and clarified the limited scope of Section 43A jurisdiction.
NANDRAM v. M/S GARWARE POLYSTER LTD
The Supreme Court held that both the Labour Court at the place of employment and the Labour Court at the place where the management decision to terminate is taken have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain termination complaints.
Pradeep Kumar v. State of U.P and Anr
The Supreme Court remanded the land acquisition compensation cases for reconsideration due to unexplained disparity in awarded amounts and directed prompt payment of compensation.
Prem Narain v. M/S Swadeshi Cotton Mills, Juhi & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a Labour Court's reinstatement award cannot be set aside due to superannuation if not challenged, and directed payment of 50% backwages till superannuation with all consequential benefits.
State of Karnataka v. Dattaraj & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of certain accused in a dowry death case, emphasizing the need for proximate cruelty linked to death and distinguishing customary gifts from dowry demands.
AIR CUSTOMS OFFICER IGI NEW DELHI v. PRAMOD KUMAR DHAMIJA
The Supreme Court held that exoneration in customs adjudication proceedings does not bar criminal prosecution unless conclusively established on merits, and quashing of criminal complaint on such basis was improper.
Kanta Tejus Manu v. Tejas Kanubhai Maun
The Supreme Court directed maintenance of status quo and expeditious disposal of a family court appeal concerning possession of a disputed flat, dismissing the civil appeal with no order as to costs.
Union of India v. Lt. Col. Faran Sidiqui
The Supreme Court held that additional Colonel vacancies created post-Kargil were meant only for Arms and Arms Support streams, rejected the claim of Services officers to a pro-rata share, and directed creation of additional posts to remedy allocation errors without recognizing a single cadre or legitimate expectation of batch parity across streams.
CHANDRAKANT ADINATH UTTURE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
The Supreme Court held that any change in the slab reducing exempted land under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act requires fresh public notice and hearing under Section 13(2) before notification.
Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Customs (Import) v. Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act is mandatory when invoked in the Show Cause Notice for mis-declaration, and set aside the CESTAT order deleting the penalty.