Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hands On Hands Ventures Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging GST show cause notice and order, permitting the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit despite limitation, while leaving the validity of extension notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. Dipti Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing the petitioner-husband to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000 to the respondent-wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing his challenge to the quantum and basis of the award.
Shruti Goenka v. Dhirendra Pandey & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell immovable property is maintainable in Delhi if the cause of action partly arises there, despite the property being located in Uttar Pradesh.
State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Narender Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a child sexual assault case due to material contradictions and lack of corroboration in the prosecution evidence.
Shatrughan Prasad and Ors. v. Rupan Jain and Ors.
The court held that only persons claiming independent rights can resist execution of possession decrees, dismissing objections by tenants' employees lacking independent title.
Nepal Siingh and Nitesh Shrivastav v. Rita Tiwari
The Delhi High Court reduced the cost imposed on defendants for belated filing of written statement under its supervisory jurisdiction to prevent undue hardship and ensure expeditious trial.
Mr. Rajesh Singh and Mr. Hritik Chaudhary v. Rajni Sangwan
The Delhi High Court disposed of the possession dispute petition on the basis of an amicable settlement allowing the tenant extended time to vacate with payment of use and occupation charges and enabling the landlord to execute possession upon default.
Delhi Jal Board v. Shri I. M. Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the arbitration petition to be heard by the appropriate Commercial Court following jurisdictional changes, imposing costs on the petitioner for delay and inaction.
Asha Agrawal & Anr. v. Jai Charan Verma Thr Lrs
Revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, as affirmed by the Delhi High Court following Supreme Court precedents.
Sudesh Rani v. Usha Rani Deceased Through LRs & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to lead rebuttal evidence on the genuineness of disputed signatures after the Trial Court wrongly refused such opportunity, ensuring fair trial in a suit for specific performance.
Shilpa Gupta v. Ashok Kansal
The High Court held that a trial court cannot prematurely close a plaintiff's right to lead evidence when an application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is pending and must decide the application before denying evidence.
Amit Kumar v. Kamaljeet Dogra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging an impleadment order.
M/S COSMIC ORANGE INFRAVENTURES PVT. LTD. v. L. SUBRAMAINAM & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC must issue notice to the opposite party before condoning delay and restoring a dismissed consumer complaint to prevent prejudice and uphold natural justice.
Sh Bhagwat Singh v. New India Assurance Company Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 227 to hear a petition when the cause of action arose outside its territory, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Mahender v. Pushpender Sharma & Ors.
The High Court upheld the Executing Court’s order directing auction of partitioned property after the Decree-Holder refused the Judgment Debtor’s offer to purchase their share, emphasizing compliance with Supreme Court timelines for execution.
M/S MHJ METALTECHS PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI SOUTH
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging GST demand orders for fraudulent ITC, directing petitioners to pursue statutory appeals under the CGST Act.
Tarun Kumar Katyal v. Vikas Katyal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement reached through mediation, confirming the binding effect of such agreements under Order XXXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi III v. M/S Globe Civil Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Service Tax's appeal against a CESTAT order on maintainability grounds, holding that such appeals lie only before the Supreme Court under the Central Excise Act.
Chirag Garg v. Commissioner State Tax, Delhi GST
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte tax demand order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner deposited part of the tax and was given an opportunity to file a reply.
Union of India v. M/s Agrawal and Co.
Limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the A&C Act begins only upon receipt of the final award after the correction period, not from provisional communication.