Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dinesh Sejwal v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused in a serious FIR, considering delay in FIR registration and their role as eyewitnesses in a related case, subject to cooperation with investigation.
Samarpit Poly Film India Private Limited v. Sandeep Laminators Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all requisite consents were obtained in writing.
Panshil Electro Private Limited v. Victora Auto Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents and the companies' financial soundness.
Ambience India Private Limited v. Allied Nippon Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to their unanimous written consent.
ATM Credit and Investments Private Limited v. Sheetal Mercantile Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties gave written consent.
PPPL Constructions Private Limited v. NCJ Infrastructure Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and statutory requirements were met.
Karan Singh v. Bloom Public School
The Delhi High Court restored a minor's school admission cancelled on grounds of a forged income certificate after verifying a fresh certificate, emphasizing protection of minors from parental misdeeds and imposing a conditional penalty.
Roshni Kori (Minor) and Ors v. Chinmaya Vidyalaya and Ors
The Delhi High Court restored the admission of minors under the EWS category despite allegations of forged income certificates, emphasizing protection of the child's right to education and imposing a penalty on the parents.
BABY MEHAK JUNEJA v. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION
The Delhi High Court restored a minor's school admission under the EWS category despite allegations of a forged income certificate, emphasizing protection of the child's right to education and imposing a penalty on the parent.
YU Televentures Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's refund claim of excess customs duty, holding that statutory authorities must comply with binding judicial decisions and cannot reject refund applications on untenable grounds such as pending appeals without stay.
Uttam Sucrotech Limited v. Uttam Sucrotech International Holdings Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to statutory compliance and sanction by the competent jurisdiction.
Mr. Rajesh Jain and Mr. Virag Tiwari, Advocates. v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES .....
The Delhi High Court set aside illegal default tax assessments and directed prompt refund with interest, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory refund timelines and natural justice under the DVAT Act.
Northern India Media Private Limited v. Amar Ujala Publications Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where the transferor is a wholly owned subsidiary and no shares are issued, relying on written consents and absence of prejudice.
Jindal Polymer Products Private Limited v. Annapurna Steels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and merger, based on unanimous written consents under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Vasundhra Celebrations Private Limited v. Vijay India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, sanctioning a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger and merger without convening meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors due to their unanimous written consent.
Awas Promoters Private Limited v. Utility Estates Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company where all parties consented in writing.
GE India Exports Private Limited v. GE India Industrial Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with shareholder meetings and directing convening creditor meetings for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation among GE group companies.
Geometric Limited v. HCL Technologies Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a company application to dispense with secured creditors' meeting and directed convening meetings of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement, while declining electronic voting in court convened meetings.
EnQuest Projects Private Limited v. EnQuest Petro Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and statutory requirements were met.
Sunitrans Logistics Pvt Ltd v. Cornell Overseas Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the presence of a jurisdiction clause in a Bill of Lading does not oust the territorial jurisdiction of Delhi courts when the suit is based on independent contractual obligations arising in Delhi.