Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pradeep Sharma v. Dharmarth Trust Mandir Shri Lakshmi Narain Ji & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that possession of premises given as part of employment is permissive and does not confer ownership rights, and upon termination of employment, the license to occupy is revoked.
Menka Chaturvedi v. The Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 Zone 6 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to non-communication of Show Cause Notices via the GST portal's 'Additional Notices Tab', remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Menka Chaturvedi v. The Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 Zone 6 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper service of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard, leaving the validity of the impugned GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Mahabir Prasad v. The Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 39 Zone 1
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order passed without hearing the petitioner on a GST Show Cause Notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Menka Chaturvedi v. The Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 Zone 6
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to provide opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Pankaj Garg v. Sales Tax Officer Class-II Ward 77, Zone 7, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a misdescription in the title of a Show Cause Notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act does not invalidate the notice if its substance clearly demands a reply, dismissing the petition challenging the notice and ex-parte order.
Magna Wires v. Avato Ward 37 State Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice service on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Zana International v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order passed on a show cause notice improperly communicated via the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Zana International v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders passed due to non-communication of notices uploaded only on a less visible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving open the validity of the impugned notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
OOZ Media Solutions v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 61 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax adjudication order passed without personal hearing due to inadequate notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
State v. Deepak Garg
The High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against the acquittal of a building owner, holding that mere ownership without proof of negligence or direct involvement does not attract criminal liability for building collapse under IPC.
State v. Sharif
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a rash and negligent driving case due to material discrepancies in eyewitness evidence and lack of prima facie case.
Rizwan Ahmed v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a large heroin trafficking case, holding that bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot be granted without reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty when commercial quantity of narcotics is recovered.
Dr. Geetanjali Aggarwal v. Dr. Manoj Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court modified the interim custody order in a guardianship dispute to extend the father's custody period with specific conditions ensuring the child's welfare and restricted visitation rights.
Gopi Chand LRs v. Harijan Sewak Sangh
The court upheld the eviction of the deceased employee's legal representatives, holding that the relationship was a lease despite the 'license fee' nomenclature, affirming the Rent Controller's jurisdiction and binding effect of admissions made by the deceased.
Monu Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioners' grievance was resolved.
Gaurav Joshi & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 120B IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a full and final compromise and mutual consent divorce.
MS Kamini Kapoor & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Lucky Sharma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between the matrimonial parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute.
Suninder Sandha v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order partially allowing document production under Section 91 CrPC, emphasizing necessity and possession criteria, and dismissed petitions challenging the order in a Section 138 NI Act complaint.