Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S BRIGHT ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. MJ BIZCRAFT LLP & ANR
The Delhi High Court summarily dismissed a passing off suit where the plaintiffs failed to establish distinctiveness or likelihood of confusion over the generic mark "PRIVE" used by defendants for a nightclub in a different hotel brand.
Bhupinder Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Section 363 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Amon Murphy & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on a genuine settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Surender Singh Chauhan & Anr v. State (G.N.C.T) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the basis of an amicable compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ram Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sachin Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Pankaj Kumar Jha v. State of NCT (Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC upon amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Azad Singh Hooda v. Delhi Technological University and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-extension of a contractual employee’s appointment based on poor performance and conduct without requiring a formal enquiry, distinguishing non-extension from punitive termination.
Sujit Kumar v. Vandana
The Delhi High Court upheld a maintenance order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing the court's discretion to estimate income and liabilities when exact details are undisclosed.
Council of the Instt of Chartered Accountants of India v. Devinder Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court held that a Chartered Accountant's disclosure of confidential audit information to third parties constitutes professional misconduct warranting reprimand, while absolving him of audit delay and conflict of interest allegations.
Sunder v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 8 of the POCSO Act for sexual assault on minor girls, dismissing the appeal despite claims of delay and prior enmity.
Nisha Arya v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of regular bail to female accused in a serious assault case, emphasizing the delay in investigation and absence of custodial necessity while imposing stringent bail conditions.
Surender Gupta v. State (Govt. of NCT)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a minor child based on the reliable sole testimony of the prosecutrix corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.
Om Prakash Jain v. Ashok Kumar Jain & Anr
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntary out-of-court settlement reached by the parties after a preliminary decree and mediation.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR v. DILIP SRIVASTAVA & ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed a commercial suit based on valid, voluntary settlement agreements reached through mediation, disposing of the suit accordingly.
The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. State Bank of India & Others
The Delhi High Court recorded a voluntary settlement between parties in a commercial dispute under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and allowed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
M/S NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD v. M/S S S SHARMA & CO
The High Court held that objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed after procedural directions under Order 7 Rule 10-A CPC cannot be dismissed as time barred by the competent court, and condoned a one-day delay caused by a court holiday.
The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. L'Enterprise Nationale d'Approvisionment en Produits Pharmaceutiques d'Alger and Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of the suit, holding that invocation of a performance bank guarantee after an eleven-year delay without proof of breach is unjustified and causes irretrievable injustice.
Sukhbir Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid for five years, but directed payment of compensation to retain possession for public use.
Neeraj Kumar Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for robbery based on credible in-court identification and recovery of stolen property, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the evidence and acquittal of co-accused.