Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shaily Mishra v. Anurag Mittal
The Delhi High Court held that a second marriage solemnized during the pendency of a stay on annulment decree is null and void under Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Atul Rana & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420 and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in non-serious criminal cases.
Tejinder Singh & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 323, 380, 427, 452, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mahabir & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mukesh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence of three accused for gang rape under Section 376(2)(g) IPC based on reliable prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical evidence, rejecting challenges on identity, procedural lapses, and minor contradictions.
Dhruv Bahl & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 279/337/338 IPC and Motor Vehicles Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mohd. Shafiq & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vikram Verma & Ors. v. The State (Govt of N.C.T.) of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rakesh Raj & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Dinesh Sharma & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable Section 498-A IPC FIR based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in matrimonial disputes.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Soma Devi v. State / NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the acquittal of accused in a sexual offence case due to lack of prosecutrix testimony and incriminating evidence.
Karan Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to comply with the Central Administrative Tribunal's order to consider the petitioner's representation for absorption in the CBI within a stipulated time.
Food Planet Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with mandatory service tax return requirements despite finding the petitioner met the five-year experience criterion.
Akshit Sachdeva v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an abduction FIR under Section 363 IPC where the girl voluntarily left her parental home and married the petitioner without inducement, relying on her Section 164 CrPC statement and proof of majority.
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd v. Helm Dungemittel GmbH
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting STC's claim that a binding contract for a reduced price was formed, emphasizing that STC's communication was not a firm offer and limiting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Rajesh Loomba v. Amarjeet & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee cannot be reinstated after the closure of the establishment and awarded compensation in lieu of reinstatement, setting aside the enforcement notice.
Kawal Bahadur Singh Batra v. Jas Kiran Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order enforcing a mediation settlement on maintenance, emphasizing the need to maintain the wife's and children's standard of living and rejecting the husband's plea of changed financial circumstances without proper review.
Zulfiqar Hussain v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the government to follow statutory procedures including inviting public objections before banning synthetic manja, while ordering interim advisories to protect public safety.