Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Naman Katyal v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in non-heinous offences.
Devender Bansal & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable copyright infringement FIR under Section 63 of the Copyright Act based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Subham Gaur v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Farhan @ Sameer v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that serious charges and prima facie evidence at an advanced trial stage justify denial of bail.
Harish Kumar @ Sri Chand & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Kapil Balani & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Nikhil Vohra & Ors. v. Sate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ramashish v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 363 and 366 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Aarti Manchanda v. Chander Shekhar Manchanda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree of divorce on the ground of desertion where the wife wilfully left the matrimonial home without reasonable cause and abandoned her matrimonial and maternal duties.
Union of India v. R.A. Sanjeev & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that amendments to the Indian Police Service seniority rules apply prospectively and officers appointed before the amendment are entitled to seniority as per the unamended rules.
Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Love Gopal Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court held that the 1995 in situ promotion scheme applies to both regular and contractual employees, entitling them to promotions and arrears subject to limitation, and directed the petitioner to consider claims and pay arrears with interest.
Dr. Nidhi Chopra and Others v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Rule 6(2) fixing 18th December 2006 as cutoff for initial constitution of Delhi Health Service, ruled that UPSC consultation is advisory not binding, and held that service disputes must be first adjudicated by the Administrative Tribunal before High Court intervention.
Atlantic Vision Private Limited v. 3Dimension Asset Reconstruction Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between seven transferor companies and one transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding no objections and no prejudice to stakeholders.
ASM Merchandisers Private Limited v. Ikta Aromatics Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two transferor companies and a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor companies without winding up.
AHIPL Management Consulting Private Limited v. Fabindia Overseas Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between AHIPL Management Consulting Private Limited and Fabindia Overseas Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transferor company to be dissolved without winding up.
The Indian Singers' Rights Association v. Chapter 25 Bar and Restaurant
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized public performance of singers' works without clearance and royalty payment infringes Performers' Rights under the Copyright Act, granting permanent injunction and ordering rendition of accounts.
Nisha Bansal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for the petitioner accused of abetment to suicide, emphasizing the gravity of allegations and the need to protect the investigation.
Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld Parliament's competence to levy service tax on the service portion of composite contracts involving supply of food and accommodation, rejecting challenges of double taxation and lack of legislative competence.
Aakaash Asthana v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Trilok Chand @ Trilok Chand Gupta v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in commercial disputes.