Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S COMPACT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. SEABUCKTHORN BEVERAGES LLP
The Delhi High Court allowed a 50% refund of court fees to the plaintiff following an out-of-court settlement reached before framing of issues under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.
Veena Sehgal & Ors. v. Krishna Sehgal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a voluntary settlement resolving a family property dispute and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Usha Pir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act's commencement.
State Bank of India v. National Commission for Scheduled Castes
The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes lacks jurisdiction to interfere with final disciplinary orders absent allegations of reservation policy violation, and its recommendations are only recommendatory, not binding.
Azad Singh Hooda v. Delhi Technology University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful non-extension of a contractual appointment, holding no violation of natural justice or vested right to contract renewal.
Western India Genuine Ghee Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses incorporated by reference in tender documents and procurement manuals constitute a valid arbitration agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
State (Govt of NCT) v. Sandeep Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of accused from Section 304B IPC charges, holding that vague allegations without specific dowry demand do not warrant framing of dowry death charges.
Sanjeev Gupta v. Kul Bhushan Malik
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal, holding that the landlord's title was established by a relinquishment deed and the rent exceeded the threshold for rent control protection, entitling the landlord to possession.
Shamsher Singh; Jai Narayan & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Section 308 IPC for simple injuries caused with dangerous weapons, rejecting the complainant's claim for attempt to murder charges under Section 307 IPC due to lack of prima facie murderous intent.
Shamsher Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Section 308 IPC for attempt to cause grievous hurt, rejecting the complainant's claim for framing charges under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder due to lack of prima facie intent to kill.
Shamsher Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Section 308 IPC for causing simple injuries without intention to murder, dismissing the complainant's plea for framing charges under Section 307 IPC.
Ashok Garg v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years.
Asha @ Ayesha v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay based on ill advice by previous counsel, setting aside the trial court's dismissal and directing the revocation application to be heard on merits.
Suresh Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, granting the petitioner a declaration of lapse.
Manish Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years of the award.
Ritesh Bansal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC due to the complainant's refusal to consent, citing non-compliance with settlement terms and unresolved payment disputes.
Central Board of Trustees, EPF v. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the EPF Appellate Tribunal's order imposing costs on the petitioner for failure to file a timely reply after a delayed deposit under Section 7-Q, dismissing the writ petition.
LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY v. ANKIT SHARMA
The Delhi High Court held that interim injunctions granted by appellate courts must be expeditiously heard and disposed of by the trial court, and extended interim orders without hearing are impermissible, directing prompt adjudication of interlocutory applications.
3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES LTD v. VENUS SAFETY & HEALTH PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the interim injunction in favor of the patent holder, holding that the patent involved novelty and inventive step over cited prior art.
M/S CHANDOK MACHINERIES v. S.N. SUNDERSON & CO.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Arbitral Tribunal's refusal to allow videography for quantification of mixed mining material, holding such relief futile and upholding the Tribunal's discretion under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act.