Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PVT. LTD. v. THE ASSESSING OFFICER, CIRCLE 10(1) & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside an order reopening income tax assessment for exceeding the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in reopening proceedings.
Pradeep Kumar Lathar v. Advance Surfactants India Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of an auction sale under the SARFAESI Act due to mandatory procedural violations and selective relaxation of conditions violating Article 14.
Planet Advertising Private Limited v. MS Ambience Pvt Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that only claims supported by TDS payments within limitation are recoverable, rejecting exclusion of time spent in winding up proceedings and starting limitation from denial of payment.
National Project Constructions Corporation Ltd v. M/S S S Sharma and Company
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order dismissing a Section 34 challenge to an arbitral award and remanded the matter for fresh reasoned consideration on merits.
State v. Ramesh Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a child kidnapping and murder case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Santosh Dochnia @ Guddi v. Late Smt Gindo Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court waived the costs imposed on the petitioner by the trial court on grounds of financial hardship without deciding the merits of the underlying application.
M/S. ACCUFIL AUTOMATION v. CHITKARA BEVERAGES & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a no cause of action application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that such issues require evidence and that supervisory interference under Article 227 is limited in commercial suits.
Vipin Wadhwa v. Prashant Enterprises & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging a consent decree on the basis of an unlawful compromise is barred under Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC even for strangers to the decree, and that a suit for specific performance filed beyond the three-year limitation period under Article 54 of the Limitation Act is time-barred.
Deepanshu & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its power under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Sulabh Arora v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 341, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Manish Pandey & Ors. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, applying established Supreme Court principles.
Vinod Kumar @ Raju v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his claim of sudden fight exception and affirming the sufficiency of consistent eyewitness, medical, and forensic evidence.
Ajay Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 498A IPC based on a bona fide amicable settlement between the married parties, promoting reconciliation and peace.
Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi II v. Shyam Spectra Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as not maintainable, holding that appeals involving taxability issues lie exclusively before the Supreme Court under Section 35L.
Narender Gulia & Ors. v. The State N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following a voluntary and amicable mediation settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
M/S SHREEHARI ANANTA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ICD PATPARGANJ
The Delhi High Court moderated onerous security conditions imposed by Customs for provisional release of imported roasted areca nuts, directing reasonable bond and bank guarantee amounts consistent with the goods' value and use restrictions.
Aditya Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to ensure information under the RTI Act is provided in electronic modes like email and pen drives, subject to safeguards, by framing appropriate rules or issuing directions.
Neelam Ranolia v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to appellants accused of disrupting Parliament with smoke canisters, holding their acts did not prima facie constitute terrorist acts under UAPA.
PACE DIGITEK PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging BSNL's rejection of the petitioners' techno-commercial bid for non-compliance and non-genuine documents, holding that BSNL acted within its rights and tender conditions.
Mahesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under IPC and POCSO where the victim, a major, had settled with the accused and the complainant withdrew prosecution, holding that continuing trial was not in the interest of justice.