Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/s. Mathuresh Infrapro Pvt Ltd. v. M/s. Chudiwala Company
The Court held that a suit seeking restitution or relief obtainable by application under Section 144 CPC is barred if filed as a fresh suit, and clever drafting to circumvent this bar warrants rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Soli Behram Sukhadwala v. Nitin D. Sohni & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision application, holding that the applicant failed to prove he was a family member residing with the deceased tenant under Section 5(11)(c) of the Bombay Rent Act, and thus was not entitled to tenancy rights.
vuqerh ;kfpdk nk[ky dsyh vkgs v. vls fuosnu dsys dh
The High Court upheld the validity of government land and tenancy orders, allowing the petitioner's appeal and directing lawful implementation with procedural compliance.
Darshan Kaur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that misuse charges are payable for exclusive office use of leased property by a foreign mission, dismissed the petitioner's challenge, and upheld the demand as a condition for conversion from leasehold to freehold.
Narayan Bhau Salve v. Khandu Baburao Salve
The court held that dismissal of appeals for default does not amount to a decree and does not affect the enforceability date of the trial court decree for limitation of execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Pankaj Subhash Tatar v. The State of Maharashtra
Costs of a preliminary inquiry under Section 83 cannot be recovered from persons exonerated in subsequent proceedings under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act.
New Sonal Industries Premises Ltd. v. District Deputy Registrar (2) & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that under MOFA, a promoter must convey leasehold rights over the entire land as per the agreement, and the Competent Authority cannot limit conveyance based on FSI utilization when the agreement provides for full conveyance.
Chandrakant C. Patel and Others v. Suryakant Shivlal Parmar and Others
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of Defendants as mere licensees, holding they failed to prove exclusive possession required for protected tenancy under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act.
Ravi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Banks Board Bureau lacks jurisdiction to conduct selections for Public Sector General Insurance Companies, quashing ACC circulars expanding its mandate and invalidating the impugned appointments.
Vakamulla Chandrashekhar & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies
The Delhi High Court held that subordinate courts lack jurisdiction to restore complaints dismissed for non-appearance, quashing the restoration and summons orders in a Companies Act offence case.
Shri Shivam Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Vileparle Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that the Competent Authority under MOFA lacks jurisdiction to substantively review or alter its conveyance orders via Corrigendum, and such disputes over land area must be resolved by Civil Courts.
Surendran v. Sub-Inspector of Police
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rash driving causing injury but modified the sentence from imprisonment to a fine considering the long delay since the offence.
Surendran v. Sub-Inspector of Police
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rash driving causing injury but converted the imprisonment sentence into a fine due to the long delay since the offence.
Abhay V. Khinvasara v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed a 38-year delayed challenge to land acquisition under the MID Act, holding the acquisition valid and the petition barred by delay and laches.
Jurgaj Singh v. BSES Yamuna Power Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to compel supply of documents for appeal against removal, holding that the respondent had duly performed its public duty and provided fair opportunity of hearing.
Shankar Pandu Bharsat v. Anand Subhashchandra Bora
The Bombay High Court upheld limitation under Section 32F(1A) of the BTAL Act, dismissing the petitioners' belated application to purchase agricultural land filed after the statutory two-year period.
ALD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory time limit under Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 for claiming Input Tax Credit, dismissing challenges to its constitutional validity and denying extension of the claim period.
ALD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory time limit under Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 for claiming Input Tax Credit, dismissing constitutional challenges and denying extension of the period by assessing authorities.
Govinda Goga Donde v. Mayur Ramesh Bora
The Bombay High Court Full Bench held that under Section 9-A CPC, a Trial Court cannot frame a preliminary issue disposing of part of a suit or cause of action; jurisdictional objections must dispose of the entire suit or cause of action.
Ashok Babulal Avasthi v. Munna Nizamuddin Khan & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that in tenant suits against municipal demolition, the landlord is a proper party whose joinder the court may permit under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, affirming judicial discretion to add landlords for complete adjudication.