Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Prasidh Leasing Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an interest-free advance by a private company to its shareholder, used for investments and loans, constitutes deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and upheld disallowance of related guarantee commission.
Ajit Kumar v. The Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the MCI's cancellation of medical registration and FIR, holding that false claims of medical education cannot be excused by unsubstantiated allegations of victimhood.
Salora International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) are time-barred if the departmental appeal is withdrawn and not effectively prosecuted, requiring penalty orders to be passed within six months of the CIT(A)'s order receipt.
Amit Kotnala v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of serious offences after considering documentary evidence of marriage and the complainant’s support, subject to furnishing bond and surety.
Royal Babu @ Milan v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a sexual offence case where the prosecutrix denied allegations and claimed to be of majority age at marriage, emphasizing that bail may be granted without expressing opinion on merits.
Mohd. Kafil v. Sumbul
The High Court directed payment of maintenance arrears in installments pending final adjudication, emphasizing the need for notice and consideration of financial capabilities before fixing maintenance.
D B Corp. Ltd. v. Government of N.C.T. Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving disputed questions of fact or law under the Working Journalists Act must be referred to the Labour Court under Section 17(2), setting aside recovery orders passed under Section 17(1).
D B CORP. LTD. v. Government of N.C.T. Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving disputed questions of fact or law under the Working Journalists Act must be referred to the Labour Court under Section 17(2), setting aside recovery orders passed under Section 17(1).
Rahul Bhargava v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld territorial jurisdiction and refused to quash the complaint and FIR alleging domestic violence and cruelty, emphasizing that such offences are continuing and triable where the aggrieved resides or cause of action arises.
Rahul Bhargava & Ors. v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
Judgment delivered by Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 2787/2016 involving petitioners Rahul Bhargava and others against the State (NCT) of Delhi.
HT Media Limited v. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr
The Delhi High Court clarified that disputes under the Working Journalists Act must be adjudicated by Labour Courts upon government reference, and a mere summon by the Deputy Labour Commissioner does not confer jurisdiction to adjudicate.
Rajesh Mahajan v. Panav Mahajan & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a revision petition by recording an amicable settlement directing the petitioner to pay consolidated maintenance and clear arrears for the child in the respondent’s custody pending trial court’s final decision under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
Anurag Jain and Ayushi Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of accused in a grievous injury case after serious charges under Sections 326 and 307 IPC were added to the FIR based on medical opinion.
Rahul Rathore and Karunesh Kumar Shukia v. Micromax
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of partners under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in a dishonoured cheque case, dismissing petitions seeking quashing of the complaint for lack of specific averments.
Sandeep Sethi v. Government of India, Ministry of Finance and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to raise constitutional issues after administrative adjudication, without expressing any opinion on merits.
Nitu Singh v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a complaint case for non-prosecution, condoned delay in filing leave petitions, granted leave to appeal, and restored the case subject to costs.
M/S VYSYA LEASING & FINANCE LTD. v. M/S AMRITLAL BAJAJ & CO. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of three consolidated suits for recovery of money by recording a consent decree based on a settlement whereby defendants agreed to pay Rs. 17.50 lakhs within six months, failing which the amount would increase to Rs. 20 lakhs.
Umesh Dutt Sharma v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a promotion order under LDCE quota, holding that unchallenged ACR gradings and merit-based selection preclude interference on grounds of alleged manipulation.
Swarn Singh v. Surinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that issues in a suit must distinctly reflect parties' pleadings and upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing fresh evidence absent new issues.
S. P. Gupta v. Kirori Mal College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under the Delhi University Act against his termination before seeking judicial intervention, while ordering expeditious disposal of related benefits claims.