Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
RAMAN ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF SGST DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a rectification order under Section 161 of the GST Act that adversely affects the assessee must be preceded by a hearing, and set aside a mechanically passed rectification order while dismissing the delayed challenge to the original demand order.
Court on its Own Motion v. M/S Obsession Naaz & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that violent obstruction of Court-appointed Advocate Commissioners executing a commission constituted wilful criminal contempt, requiring strict adherence to the high standard of proof and careful exercise of contempt jurisdiction.
Sunil Kumar Dawar v. District Magistrate & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Registrar has no power to annul a registered Sale Deed alleged to be fraudulently executed, and such disputes must be resolved by Civil Courts.
Yatra Online Limited v. Mach Conferences and Events Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's injunction application, holding that 'YATRA' is a generic term and the Defendant's marks 'BOOKMYYATRA' and 'BOOKMYYATRA.COM' do not infringe or pass off the Plaintiff's trademarks.
Sushil Kumar T/A Da Polo & Anr. v. The Polo/ Lauren Company L.P.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's territorial jurisdiction in a trademark infringement suit involving online business, emphasizing purposeful targeting and commercial transactions within the forum and restricting interference under Article 227 to cases of patent illegality.
Champion Project Enterprises & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition alleging copyright infringement of the 'SPAN' Project by the Government's APAAR ID Project due to lack of evidence of copying or unauthorized use.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed Mankind Pharma's appeal and set aside the refusal to register the trademark 'PETKIND', holding that the appellant's prior use and goodwill in the 'KIND' family of marks outweighed the similarity with the cited mark under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Brigadier Sudarshan Kumar Grover v. Brig. (Retd.) Surinder Kumar Grover
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow examination of additional witnesses at a belated stage in a long-pending partition suit, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Mensa Brand Technologies Private Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Registrar's rejection of the trade mark “PRO.FITNESS”, holding that distinctiveness must be assessed as a whole without dissecting composite marks.
Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Ram Kumar M/s Dr. Kumars Pharmaceuticals
The Delhi High Court allowed Mankind Pharma's petition to cancel the 'UNKIND' trademark registered by the respondent for non-use and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's established 'KIND' family of marks.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited v. Kulbir Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the 'ROGER' trademark registered by Respondent No.1 for non-use under Section 47(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, recognizing the Petitioner as a person aggrieved with prior rights in the 'JOLLY ROGER' mark.
GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. DILEEP KUMAR ALIAS DILIP & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the award of 60% permanent functional disability and compensation to the injured claimant while staying the award pending deposit of the decretal amount, rejecting the insurer's challenge on disability quantum but issuing notice on delay in DAR and loss of income evidence.
CONDOR FOOTWEAR (INDIA) LIMITED v. NEXGEN FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that additional documents filed with replication in response to specific denials in a commercial suit are permissible under court rules without separate leave, dismissing the defendants' appeal against their admission.
Ranjan Rattan Vadhera v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review application and upheld the dismissal of probate petition due to failure to prove the Testatrix's signature on the Will as required under Section 69 of the Indian Evidence Act, rejecting the applicability of the presumption under Section 90.
Joginder Pal Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a petition for letters of administration cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds based on extraneous material beyond the petition, and validity challenges to the Will require trial.
Navin Ahuja v. Office of Lt. Governor of Delhi, NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board's rejection of a life convict's premature release for inadequate reasoning and remanded the case for reconsideration in line with legal principles emphasizing reformative progress.
Mohd. Ubaid v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking regularization of a shop license, holding that eviction of the predecessor-in-interest had attained finality, barring any transfer of rights, and that repeated litigation constituted abuse of process barred by res judicata.
Mohit Goel & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between matrimonial parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Inderjeet & Ors. v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Fardeen Ali & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under non-compoundable offences based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.