Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Steel Authority of India Limited v. G K Lata & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that common evidence can be recorded in connected Section 138 NI Act complaints if no prejudice is caused, quashing the Revisional Court’s order mandating separate evidence.
Steel Authority of India Limited v. G K Lata & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that clubbing of evidence in multiple Section 138 NI Act complaints is permissible when the accused acquiesce and no prejudice is caused, setting aside the Revisional Court's order mandating separate evidence.
Steel Authority of India Limited v. G K Lata & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore the trial court’s order permitting clubbing of evidence in multiple connected cheque bounce complaints, rejecting the Revisional Court’s direction for separate evidence recording to prevent undue delay.
Kaustav Barua v. University of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a student detained for shortage of attendance must be re-admitted to the same semester and cannot be promoted, notwithstanding injury or university notifications.
Vinod Kumar Pandey and Anr. v. Sheesh Ram Saini and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Letters Patent Appeals are not maintainable against orders passed by a Single Judge exercising criminal jurisdiction in writ petitions directing registration of FIRs.
Vinod Kumar Pandey and Anr. v. Sheesh Ram Saini & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Letters Patent Appeals under Clause 10 are not maintainable against Single Judge orders in criminal writ petitions directing registration of FIRs, affirming that such writ petitions involve exercise of criminal jurisdiction.
India Tourism Development Corporation v. CP Associates Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards against ITDC, ruling that arbitration jurisdiction extended to subcontractor by conduct, delay claims were barred due to petitioner's own default, and condoned delay in re-filing petitions with costs.
Rahul Sharma v. State & Ors.
The High Court allowed withdrawal of an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and permitted filing of a proper complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C., setting aside dismissal orders of lower courts.
Intercity Hotel GmbH v. Hotel Intercity Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction against defendants using HOTEL INTERCITY DELHI, holding defendants' prior use rights under Section 34 Trade Marks Act prevail absent plaintiff's local use or goodwill in India.
Mohan Kabira v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate's application for Guest Teacher empanelment due to willful submission of incorrect information and failure to avail correction opportunity.
Lalit Kumar Arya & Anr. v. M/S Prabhat Zarda Factory International (Noida)
The Delhi High Court held that the assignee recorded by the Registrar of Trademarks is entitled to continue trademark infringement suits as successor in interest under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC, subject to trial on validity of assignment and competing Will claims.
ALM Food Products Limited v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of subsidy under the Integrated Cold Chain Scheme, holding that applications must comply with revised guidelines and be submitted in response to valid EOIs.
Ashok Kumar Tohani v. M/S Capital First Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award for recovery of loan dues secured by mortgaged property, dismissing the petitioners' challenge on non-service grounds and directing surplus auction proceeds to be paid to the borrowers.
M/S ASHWATH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S BANTAIR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants for infringing the plaintiff's registered design of a rain water filter, restraining manufacture and sale of colorable imitations.
Pushpendra Kumar Jain v. Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary authority’s order demoting the petitioner for recruitment irregularities, holding that admissions and evidence justified punishment without formal enquiry and refused to interfere under Article 226.
Colonel Anand Sagar Sahgal (Retd.) and Anr. v. Director General Resettlement, Ministry of Defence, Government of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dis-empanelment of an ex-serviceman security agency for quoting service charges below 14%, holding that punitive action was unjustified amid conflicting guidelines and tender conditions.
Shalini & Anr v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by including future prospects, disallowed loss of love and affection, and held that the insurer cannot recover from the owner absent deliberate policy breach.
Shalini & Anr v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct minimum wages and future prospects, disallowed loss of love and affection, and held the insurer cannot recover from the owner absent deliberate policy breach.
East Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Yogesh Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the de-sealing of a property in an unauthorized colony protected under the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) (Second Amendment) Act, 2014, dismissing EDMC's challenge.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Shakuntala Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting partial reimbursement under the LTC scheme despite tickets being purchased from unauthorized agents, dismissing the government's challenge.