Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.
Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.
Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.
SLS Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that reopening income tax assessments for pre-2013-14 years on the ground of excessive share premium is unjustified without tangible material, as share premium is a capital receipt and relevant statutory amendments are prospective.
M/s. Parle Products Ltd. v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that exported biscuits not bearing retail sale price in rupees are not exempt under notification No.3/2006-CE, entitling the manufacturer to rebate of excise duty paid, and directed refund of duty retained without authority of law.
Roma Ramesh Kamble v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld that contract workers at minority girls' hostels have no right to regularization or permanent status absent sanctioned permanent posts, following the Apex Court precedent in State of Maharashtra v. Anita.
Coral Telecom Ltd v. Elcom Innovations Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator, holding that no valid arbitration agreement exists between Coral Telecom and Elcom Innovations Pvt. Ltd. under the MoUs invoked.
Noor Ahmed Mohammed Bagwan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen theory, recovery of the body, and medical proof of homicidal death.
Golu Mustak Khan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the murder convictions of accused nos. 1 to 3 based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and acquitted accused no.4 for lack of sufficient evidence.
Florentine Estates of India Ltd & Anr. v. Lokesh Dahiya & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator filed by Petitioner No.1 due to lack of locus standi and non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements under the Arbitration Act, rejecting invocation of the Doctrine of Group of Companies.
Union of India and Anr v. Syed Sajid Ali
The Court held that the effective date of suspension is the date of issuance of the order with immediate effect, and suspension extensions granted after 90 days without prior review are invalid, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Jayant Kumar Jain v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a property-related economic offence case, holding that investigation under a later FIR was impermissible due to overlap with an earlier FIR already investigated and closed.
M/S. FAIME MAKERS PVT.LTD v. DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (3), MUMBAI
The Bombay High Court upheld the competent authority’s order granting Deemed Conveyance of leasehold rights to a housing society, rejecting the petitioner’s objections on maintainability, promoter status, and area conveyed.
Rajendra Tribhuvandas Navare v. Solapur Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court held that the Industrial Court erred in dismissing a labour complaint solely on res judicata without framing the issue earlier or adjudicating substantive claims, and ordered fresh adjudication.
M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.
Fateh Singh Chauhan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was barred by res judicata from seeking second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme after earlier tribunal and court decisions.
Mohd. Zakir Habib Khan v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court acquitted the appellant of sexual offences, holding that the POCSO Act cannot be applied retrospectively and the victim's testimony was unreliable to sustain conviction.
Manish Saini v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a police recruitment appointment based on the Screening Committee’s lawful assessment that an acquittal on benefit of doubt does not guarantee suitability for service in a disciplined force.
HPCL-Mittal Pipeline Limited v. Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for breach of natural justice where the tribunal ignored the respondent's defence without adequate notice or opportunity, emphasizing the need for fair procedure in arbitration.
Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd. v. Noshir Nani Desai
The Bombay High Court held that service during foreign assignment with a group company is continuous service for gratuity purposes and directed computation of gratuity based on basic salary under the Payment of Gratuity Act, dismissing challenges to the Appellate Authority's remand order.