Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, based on mutual consent and diligent pursuit by the parties.
M/S PVR LIMITED v. M/S MMR SAHA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed arbitration proceedings to be conducted under DIAC due to the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator.
M/S GILL INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a technical bid for an LPG bottling plant due to the presence of overhead electrical lines, emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender decisions absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
Prof (Dr.) J. Sundaresan Pillai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order denying extension of service to a scientist post-retirement, holding that extension is discretionary and not warranted where a suitable successor is available.
Mohd. Khadim Hussain v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Mohd. Khadim Hussain for robbery and related offences based on consistent victim testimony, medical evidence, and recovery of stolen articles despite procedural lapses.
Anwar @ Karamat v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for theft-related offences under Sections 411 and 413 IPC based on credible recovery of stolen currency and corroborative evidence despite minor omissions in the FIR.
Kusum Bhatt v. Central Information Commission
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of RTI information relating to the status of action on a complaint involving personal income tax details, holding such information exempt under Sections 24 and 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
Kavash Khanna v. Faculty of Management Studies
The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi could not deny MBA admission by imposing a cut-off date for submission of graduation results not mentioned in the eligibility criteria, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's application.
M/S PSA NITROGEN LIMITED v. MAEDA CORPORATION & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a counter-claim must be registered before the time limit for filing the written statement begins, allowing the petitioner to file the written statement despite delay due to non-registration of the counter-claim.
Indcon Boiler Ltd. v. M/S Maeda Corporation India & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed written statement to an unregistered counter-claim, clarifying that the time limit for filing begins only after proper registration and service of summons under the Commercial Courts Act and CPC.
Prof. S K Atreya v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking reversion from a higher post to a lower post on the ground that no legal right exists for such reversion and administrative discretion in service matters is not subject to judicial interference.
Pintu v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Hira Nand v. Smt. Shakun & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of commercial tenants on bona fide requirement grounds filed by co-owners under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, rejecting tenant's defenses including non-impleadment and alternative accommodation claims.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd v. Bhupesh Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the disability assessment, enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, and ordered partial release of awarded compensation to meet the claimant's medical expenses.
Anshuman Dubey v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court directed the Grievance Redressal Cell to resolve JNU Students Union election disputes strictly per Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, dismissing petitions without deciding factual controversies.
Anshuman Dubey v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court directed the JNU Grievance Redressal Cell to resolve all Students Union election disputes strictly per the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations, dismissing the petitions without deciding factual controversies.
Vedansh Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Grievance Redressal Cell to act on the petitioner’s complaint within 24 hours as per Lyngdoh Committee guidelines but declined to interfere with the concluded student union election results.
Vandana Sharma v. Dwarka Court Bar Associates & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere inclusion in another Bar Association's voters list does not disqualify a member from contesting elections unless the member has actually voted, and directed inclusion of the petitioner in the voters list and election candidacy.
Balesh Kumar v. Santosh Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, staying execution until 31.12.2020 subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate and pay arrears and charges.
Ram Vishal Gupta & Ors. v. Shokeen & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim for a deceased MCA student by fixing notional income based on academic and placement data rather than minimum wages alone.