Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kirashwati v. Sanjay & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in its order regarding the applicable CPC rules and dismissed the petition challenging maintainability, directing the Trial Court to decide the application expeditiously.
Anju Bala v. Pooja Arora
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a complaint under Section 138 NI Act dismissed for non-prosecution, holding that absence was not intentional and justice requires deciding the case on merits.
Renewable Energy Developers Association of Andhra Pradesh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging tender conditions restricting bidders to manufacturers and excluding consortiums, holding such conditions reasonable and not arbitrary, emphasizing judicial restraint in tender matters.
Directorate of Education & Ors. v. Brahampal Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside disciplinary punishment imposed without evidence, affirming that disciplinary authorities cannot disregard inquiry reports without valid reasons.
Sanjay v. Banwari Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the functional disability assessment from 20% to 40% for a labourer injured in a motor accident, increasing compensation to reflect the true impact on his earning capacity.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisho & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to indemnify compensation for a tractor accident despite non-agricultural use, applying the 'pay and recover' principle and directing compensation based on the deceased's place of work.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. NISHO & ORS
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to indemnify compensation for a tractor accident despite non-agricultural use and uninsured trolley attachment, modifying compensation based on applicable minimum wages.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Air India Ltd.
Limitation for challenging a majority arbitral award runs from its receipt date, and defective initial filings beyond the prescribed limitation period cannot be cured by later re-filing, leading to dismissal of the petition.
Dr Poornima Advani & Anr v. Govt of NCT & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal seeking interest on refunded e-stamp value as the issue was not raised earlier, confirming refund of the principal amount only.
Union of India v. Deep Chand Sharma and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing retrospective regularization of ad hoc promotions and seniority reckoning from vacancy dates for promotees delayed by administrative lapses in holding DPCs.
Sunil Bhalla & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Sanjiv K Singh & Ors. v. Ritu Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that property purchased from ancestral sale proceeds is self-acquired, not HUF property, and set aside a family settlement induced by misrepresentation, decreeing equal partition among legal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act.
Poonam Garg v. IFCI Venture Capital Funds Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an employee can withdraw a voluntary retirement notice before its effective date unless barred by specific provisions, and quashed the employer's arbitrary rejection of such withdrawal.
INTERTEK INDIA PVT LTD v. PRIYANKA MOHAN
The High Court held that a suit for declaration of illegal termination and damages is maintainable even without seeking reinstatement, and the plaint cannot be partially rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
HCL Infotech Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's procedural objection to notice address, holding that notice served on authorized representative with copy to appropriate authority suffices.
Ram Chander v. Virender Kuamr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction after the parties settled their dispute and the tenant handed over vacant possession.
M/S AJAY AUTO SPARES v. VIRENDER KUAMR
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an eviction revision petition following settlement and stayed eviction execution until the tenant vacates the premises by a specified date under binding undertaking.
Jagdish Prasad & Son v. Krishan Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction as withdrawn on an undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and stay of eviction execution until then.
Union of India v. M/S JCB India Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a belated petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limitation cannot be extended beyond 120 days even after return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Sanjeev Gupta v. Satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn after the tenant settled the eviction dispute and vacated the premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.