Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
State of NCT of Delhi v. Dharambir & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed directions criticizing police investigation and ordering disciplinary action without hearing, emphasizing judicial restraint and natural justice principles.
Dilshad Ali v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside recovery of Rs. 2,80,275/- from a retired CRPF officer's pension for lack of due process and violation of Supreme Court guidelines on recovery from retired employees.
Vijay Prasad Nautiyal & Ors. v. The State of N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Binaifer Batiwala v. Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of a tenant for erecting a permanent unauthorized structure annexed to the tenanted premises under Section 16(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
M/S GYAN CHAND GOEL v. ERAINFRA ENGINEERING LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed early hearing applications but ultimately dismissed the commercial petitions as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request to seek alternative remedies.
COSMOS JEWELLERS PVT. LTD. v. PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD.
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple petitions and pending applications between Cosmos Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and PNB Housing Finance Ltd. based on a recorded settlement.
Naveen Goyal v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Naveen Goyal in a serious rape and extortion case due to the gravity of allegations and his absconding status.
Yashpal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a police constable accused under Section 306 IPC for allegedly instigating suicide, emphasizing the seriousness of the suicide note and the accused's absconding status.
M/S JBM INDUSTRIES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the disallowance of educational expenses claimed by a company for the overseas MBA of a director's daughter, holding such expenses were personal and not deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act due to lack of business nexus and failure to produce evidence.
Naresh Sehrawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as barred by delay and laches, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims without proof of title or timely action.
Vijay Kumar @ Babloo v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of three appellants for murder and robbery based on reliable circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, recoveries, and forensic proof, dismissing their appeals.
Gupta Bros. (India) v. GAIL India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the consent of parties.
Gupta Bros. (India) v. Gail India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitration proceedings under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the consent of both parties.
Manjit Kaur v. Guru Singh Sabha Khalsa
The Delhi High Court held that a teacher is not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus termination of her service cannot be challenged under that Act.
M.C.D. v. Shanti Devi
The Delhi High Court held that disengagement of a casual daily wage worker without 240 days of service does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's award of reinstatement and back wages.
Ahasaas Agarwal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Avinash Kumar & Ors. v. State N.C.T of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Manish Aggarwal v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from it after the parties to a matrimonial dispute amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Inderjeet Singh & Ors. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 307, 308, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that further prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Ravinder Kumar & Ors. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.