Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-3 v. Ankush Saluja
The Delhi High Court upheld that additions under Section 68 cannot be made under Section 153C in the absence of incriminating documents found during search when the original assessment is complete.
Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. Vidya Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the interim status quo order on disputed property possession during pendency of connected writ petitions and disposed of the Letters Patent Appeals accordingly.
QUTAB BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. v. EVOLVE INFOTRAIN INDIA PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit seeking mandatory injunctions for registration and mutation of land sale deeds, holding that statutory remedies under the Registration Act and Delhi Land Revenue Act must be exhausted and that without a registered Sale Deed, the plaintiff has no locus to challenge subsequent registrations.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2 v. M/S Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 should be kept in abeyance pending outcome of appeals against the tribunal order forming their basis, allowing revival if the revenue succeeds.
Kirti @ Pooja v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of robbery, distinguishing her limited role and considering prior bail and investigation status, subject to conditions.
Jain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 420 and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and no objection from the complainant.
Neeraj Alias Nagar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 326/34 IPC while acquitting accused of murder charges, affirming the admissibility of weapon recovery under Section 27 Evidence Act and the principle of common intention despite minor discrepancies and absence of motive.
Amit Luhach v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order framing charges for lack of application of mind and remanded the matter for a fresh order indicating satisfaction of a prima facie case.
Amit Luhach and Akhilesh Yadav v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the trial court must indicate application of mind when framing charges under Section 228 CrPC, and set aside a non-speaking order lacking such indication, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Kamal Luthra v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court refused to quash NBWs issued against the petitioner for alleged offences under the Companies Act, directing the trial court to consider his applications for cancellation of warrants and bail, while keeping the warrants in abeyance temporarily due to his medical condition.
Anil Kaura @ Sachin v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder and attempt to murder case, holding that serious allegations and prima facie involvement preclude bail despite contradictions and delay in FIR.
M/S SHRI COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S FELICIA REALCON INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld conditional leave to defend in a summary suit, requiring the appellant to deposit the claimed amount due to failure to raise a bona fide triable issue and admission of liability by issuance of dishonored cheques.
Glencore International AG v. M/S Shree Ganesh Metals & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that no valid arbitration agreement existed in the unsigned 2016 contract, and thus the dispute was not referable to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Poonam Devi & Ors. v. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 166, upholding the award under Section 163A due to lack of credible evidence of rash and negligent driving.
Praveen Kumar v. Dinesh Arora
The Delhi High Court held that a Trial Court cannot defer consideration of an application under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC until the written statement is filed and directed expeditious disposal of such application.
Rajni Gupta v. Vikas Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that refusal to admit additional documents and witnesses in matrimonial proceedings is an interlocutory order not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act and dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's order.
Panchshila Co-Operative House Building Society v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to continue enforcing MPD-2021 mixed use regulations against violators with due process, dismissing the petitioner’s broader relief claims.
Arpit Bhargava v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to enforce copyright laws against unauthorized publication of legislative materials while recognizing the constitutional right to access authentic legal documents.
M/S PRESTRESS WIRE INDUSTRIES v. M/S UPPAL BUILDERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37, upholding the arbitral award and affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sahil v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that exclusion of candidates who had already secured admission from a special drive admission list without Academic Council approval was illegal and directed consideration of petitioners for admission if seats were available.